← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2611.10986 · v1
The forces at hand: social learning is permissive, not instructive, for the evolution of phenotypic plasticity
首次提交 2026-11-08 06:00
版本更新 2026-11-08 06:00
雷达观测 2026-11-10 12:16
摘要
Evolution can favour a trait for two reasons: an instructive cause makes selection favour the trait; a permissive one lets it persist once selection no longer removes it. The distinction matters most for phenotypic plasticity and its replacement by inherited behaviour, genetic assimilation, the Baldwin effect. Social learning is credited with favouring plasticity on evidence that cannot tell the two apart: how much plasticity remains at the end of a simulation. Here we show, analytically and computationally, which role it plays in a minimal model of learning and evolution. Writing expected fitness as a function of plasticity, we find that environmental change is the only source of benefit from plasticity, and the social channel enters only its cost. Simulation confirms this: in a static environment selection against plasticity never reverses sign at any channel strength; when the environment changes, it reverses at a threshold the channel lowers, and without the channel the population collapses before reaching it. Social learning is permissive, not instructive: it supplies the means to be plastic, never the reason. For the debate over whether plasticity leads evolution, this is one case settled by measurement: environmental change directs, socially inherited information permits, and neither suffices alone.
作者备注：21 pages, 4 figures. Code and archived outputs: https://github.com/drnamlabs-gif/forces-at-hand
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v1 · 2026-11-08 06:00 · 最新观测版本
The forces at hand: social learning is permissive, not instructive, for the evolution of phenotypic plasticity
Evolution can favour a trait for two reasons: an instructive cause makes selection favour the trait; a permissive one lets it persist once selection no longer removes it. The distinction matters most for phenotypic plasticity and its replacement by inherited behaviour, genetic assimilation, the Baldwin effect. Social learning is credited with favouring plasticity on evidence that cannot tell the two apart: how much plasticity remains at the end of a simulation. Here we show, analytically and computationally, which role it plays in a minimal model of learning and evolution. Writing expected fitness as a function of plasticity, we find that environmental change is the only source of benefit from plasticity, and the social channel enters only its cost. Simulation confirms this: in a static environment selection against plasticity never reverses sign at any channel strength; when the environment changes, it reverses at a threshold the channel lowers, and without the channel the population collapses before reaching it. Social learning is permissive, not instructive: it supplies the means to be plastic, never the reason. For the debate over whether plasticity leads evolution, this is one case settled by measurement: environmental change directs, socially inherited information permits, and neither suffices alone.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗