跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.11470 · v1

GOPR-CAD: Graph-of-Operations Progressive Reasoning for CAD Generation

首次提交 2026-11-09 00:07
版本更新 2026-11-09 00:07
雷达观测 2026-11-10 12:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Generating accurate CAD models requires substantial engineering expertise and careful control of geometry, topology, and mechanical constraints. Text-to-CAD aims to simplify this process, but current LLM-based methods often generate CAD programs directly. Language models remain unreliable when producing long code while coordinating coupled geometric, topological, and dimensional constraints. Consequently, executable programs may still produce structurally incorrect models, which execution rate and rendered appearance may fail to reveal. To address these limitations, we propose GOPR-CAD, an agentic Text-to-CAD pipeline based on Graph-of-Operations Progressive Reasoning. A language model acts as a decision agent over encapsulated CAD operations and progressively constructs an executable operation graph, which a deterministic compiler converts into the final CAD model. This separation requires no additional training and supports different language models. To evaluate structural fidelity, we construct MHCAD, a benchmark of 300 standard mechanical part requirements derived from Machinery's Handbook. Their explicit structures enable reference-free STEP/B-rep evaluation. GOPR-CAD achieves 82.7% Structural Yield on MHCAD, and 87.2% Structural Yield on an external CADPrompt subset.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-09 00:07 · 最新观测版本

GOPR-CAD: Graph-of-Operations Progressive Reasoning for CAD Generation

Generating accurate CAD models requires substantial engineering expertise and careful control of geometry, topology, and mechanical constraints. Text-to-CAD aims to simplify this process, but current LLM-based methods often generate CAD programs directly. Language models remain unreliable when producing long code while coordinating coupled geometric, topological, and dimensional constraints. Consequently, executable programs may still produce structurally incorrect models, which execution rate and rendered appearance may fail to reveal. To address these limitations, we propose GOPR-CAD, an agentic Text-to-CAD pipeline based on Graph-of-Operations Progressive Reasoning. A language model acts as a decision agent over encapsulated CAD operations and progressively constructs an executable operation graph, which a deterministic compiler converts into the final CAD model. This separation requires no additional training and supports different language models. To evaluate structural fidelity, we construct MHCAD, a benchmark of 300 standard mechanical part requirements derived from Machinery's Handbook. Their explicit structures enable reference-free STEP/B-rep evaluation. GOPR-CAD achieves 82.7% Structural Yield on MHCAD, and 87.2% Structural Yield on an external CADPrompt subset.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗