跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.11529 · v1

Data Manipulation Attacks Against Machine Learning Integrated Cyber-Physical Systems

首次提交 2026-11-09 02:10
版本更新 2026-11-09 02:10
雷达观测 2026-11-10 13:19
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

There is a well-established body of work demonstrating that individual machine learning (ML) algorithms can be manipulated or deceived. However, in many real-world systems, multiple ML algorithms are composed to enable automated decision-making, particularly in Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS). Often such systems use a composition of vision, planning, and other ML models to affect their internal state and ultimate take actions in the physical world. While there is a huge literature on the (in)security of ML algorithms, it is not immediately clear how an attacker might leverage their ability to trick individual learners when attacking the composition as a whole. We develop methods for creating an attack policy (a mapping from state to attack) for a data-manipulating attacker affecting a CPS or other state-machine-based AI compositions. We describe our framework, a basic threat model and corresponding methods for computing an optimal attack policy, as well as planned extensions. The goal of this work-in-progress paper is to stimulate conversation and forge new collaborations regarding the security of compositional learning.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-09 02:10 · 最新观测版本

Data Manipulation Attacks Against Machine Learning Integrated Cyber-Physical Systems

There is a well-established body of work demonstrating that individual machine learning (ML) algorithms can be manipulated or deceived. However, in many real-world systems, multiple ML algorithms are composed to enable automated decision-making, particularly in Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS). Often such systems use a composition of vision, planning, and other ML models to affect their internal state and ultimate take actions in the physical world. While there is a huge literature on the (in)security of ML algorithms, it is not immediately clear how an attacker might leverage their ability to trick individual learners when attacking the composition as a whole. We develop methods for creating an attack policy (a mapping from state to attack) for a data-manipulating attacker affecting a CPS or other state-machine-based AI compositions. We describe our framework, a basic threat model and corresponding methods for computing an optimal attack policy, as well as planned extensions. The goal of this work-in-progress paper is to stimulate conversation and forge new collaborations regarding the security of compositional learning.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗