跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.11692 · v1

LocateAnyMesh: Grounding 3D Mesh Queries in 2D Images with Vision-Language Models

首次提交 2026-11-09 07:24
版本更新 2026-11-09 07:24
雷达观测 2026-11-10 13:19
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Textured 3D meshes specify object geometry and appearance, making them a natural query for finding a particular asset in an image. We introduce LocateAnyMesh, a vision-language model that uses the mesh itself as part of its prompt. A frozen 3D encoder maps colored surface points to a compact token sequence, which a learned connector places alongside image and instruction tokens. We evaluate two grounding models with PPAT mesh tokens: LAM-Select selects image-region proposals, while LAM-Direct predicts coordinates directly. Neither requires rendered query views or view-template matching. New objects require a single encoder pass and no object-specific fine-tuning. LAM-Select improves localization on the reported real-image suites and the official BOP YCB-V evaluation. Secondary experiments compare mesh encoders, and a LAM-Direct study isolates surface color. A single-seed LAM-Select continuation supplies pointing and mesh-only description evidence without replacing the reported localization model. The results support mesh tokens as a query representation, with remaining limitations in presence decisions, identity binding, proposal coverage, and descriptive fidelity.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-09 07:24 · 最新观测版本

LocateAnyMesh: Grounding 3D Mesh Queries in 2D Images with Vision-Language Models

Textured 3D meshes specify object geometry and appearance, making them a natural query for finding a particular asset in an image. We introduce LocateAnyMesh, a vision-language model that uses the mesh itself as part of its prompt. A frozen 3D encoder maps colored surface points to a compact token sequence, which a learned connector places alongside image and instruction tokens. We evaluate two grounding models with PPAT mesh tokens: LAM-Select selects image-region proposals, while LAM-Direct predicts coordinates directly. Neither requires rendered query views or view-template matching. New objects require a single encoder pass and no object-specific fine-tuning. LAM-Select improves localization on the reported real-image suites and the official BOP YCB-V evaluation. Secondary experiments compare mesh encoders, and a LAM-Direct study isolates surface color. A single-seed LAM-Select continuation supplies pointing and mesh-only description evidence without replacing the reported localization model. The results support mesh tokens as a query representation, with remaining limitations in presence decisions, identity binding, proposal coverage, and descriptive fidelity.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗