跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.11914 · v1

CRAFT-GBM: Selecting Best Features for Gradient-Boosted Machine Learning

首次提交 2026-11-09 13:36
版本更新 2026-11-09 13:36
雷达观测 2026-11-10 13:18
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Feature subsampling is used to accelerate gradient-boosted trees, yet standard approaches fix the feature count in advance and largely ignore the split-gain evidence accumulated during training. We introduce CRAFT-GBM (Confidence-Ranked Adaptive Feature Tracking), a native LightGBM extension that uses this evidence to adapt which---and, by default, how many---features are searched each boosting round. CRAFT-GBM transforms root-split gains into bounded observations and constructs joint time-uniform bounds valid under adaptive, non-stationary training histories. In its default endogenous mode, after initialization, CRAFT-GBM retains exactly the features that cannot yet be ruled out as best, letting the selected feature-set size $K_t$ emerge from training history rather than a pre-specified fraction. With probability at least $1-δ$, every feature with the largest expected gain is retained jointly across all rounds after initialization. When a feature fraction $f$ is specified instead, CRAFT-GBM ranks features by their interval point estimates and provides an approximate top-$K$ guarantee for feature budget $K_f$. We implement CRAFT-GBM within LightGBM while preserving its native feature-bundling representation, and evaluate it across 14 public and synthetic dataset families and four noise-augmented settings. In the fully endogenous setting, CRAFT-GBM reduces per-fit training time by 39.74\% with 1.04\% lower test loss in the geometric mean across all 18 RQ1 experiments. Under pre-specified feature fraction $f$, Exogenous CRAFT-GBM also yields aggregate training-time reductions up to 13.52 percentage points larger than random feature subsampling, with no increase in aggregate test loss relative to full-feature LightGBM. Accumulated training evidence can thus support adaptive feature search with statistical guarantees while retaining the practical advantages of native gradient boosting.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-09 13:36 · 最新观测版本

CRAFT-GBM: Selecting Best Features for Gradient-Boosted Machine Learning

Feature subsampling is used to accelerate gradient-boosted trees, yet standard approaches fix the feature count in advance and largely ignore the split-gain evidence accumulated during training. We introduce CRAFT-GBM (Confidence-Ranked Adaptive Feature Tracking), a native LightGBM extension that uses this evidence to adapt which---and, by default, how many---features are searched each boosting round. CRAFT-GBM transforms root-split gains into bounded observations and constructs joint time-uniform bounds valid under adaptive, non-stationary training histories. In its default endogenous mode, after initialization, CRAFT-GBM retains exactly the features that cannot yet be ruled out as best, letting the selected feature-set size $K_t$ emerge from training history rather than a pre-specified fraction. With probability at least $1-δ$, every feature with the largest expected gain is retained jointly across all rounds after initialization. When a feature fraction $f$ is specified instead, CRAFT-GBM ranks features by their interval point estimates and provides an approximate top-$K$ guarantee for feature budget $K_f$. We implement CRAFT-GBM within LightGBM while preserving its native feature-bundling representation, and evaluate it across 14 public and synthetic dataset families and four noise-augmented settings. In the fully endogenous setting, CRAFT-GBM reduces per-fit training time by 39.74\% with 1.04\% lower test loss in the geometric mean across all 18 RQ1 experiments. Under pre-specified feature fraction $f$, Exogenous CRAFT-GBM also yields aggregate training-time reductions up to 13.52 percentage points larger than random feature subsampling, with no increase in aggregate test loss relative to full-feature LightGBM. Accumulated training evidence can thus support adaptive feature search with statistical guarantees while retaining the practical advantages of native gradient boosting.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗