跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.11926 · v1

Text Alone Predicts Which Classes a Segmentation Readout Keeps

首次提交 2026-11-09 13:54
版本更新 2026-11-09 13:54
雷达观测 2026-11-10 13:18
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

An open-vocabulary segmentation readout silently loses a class deployed beyond its training categories. It still emits masks with high confidence, but the class never wins a single pixel. The training loss falls anyway, and mIoU can even rise while classes die. We show that which classes collapse is written in the class-name list alone. Before any image is seen, we rank each class's collapse risk from its text similarity to the training vocabulary alone. The ranking holds at AUROC 0.69-0.96 across nine model families, twelve backbones and eight pretraining recipes. Two further families, measured only after the predictions were written down, land in the same band. What the list writes, it can rewrite. With identical images and a class's counterpart moved in or out of the training list, retraining flips that class's gain over the frozen baseline by 21 IoU points; swapping in unrelated names changes nothing. We find a vocabulary-distance mechanism behind the collapse. Collapsed classes lose every vote to near-name neighbors, but in the frozen features they survive. Turning down the readout's amplitude, or stopping training early, brings them back, up to +16 points, without retraining; trained with its amplitude held down, the readout never collapses.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-09 13:54 · 最新观测版本

Text Alone Predicts Which Classes a Segmentation Readout Keeps

An open-vocabulary segmentation readout silently loses a class deployed beyond its training categories. It still emits masks with high confidence, but the class never wins a single pixel. The training loss falls anyway, and mIoU can even rise while classes die. We show that which classes collapse is written in the class-name list alone. Before any image is seen, we rank each class's collapse risk from its text similarity to the training vocabulary alone. The ranking holds at AUROC 0.69-0.96 across nine model families, twelve backbones and eight pretraining recipes. Two further families, measured only after the predictions were written down, land in the same band. What the list writes, it can rewrite. With identical images and a class's counterpart moved in or out of the training list, retraining flips that class's gain over the frozen baseline by 21 IoU points; swapping in unrelated names changes nothing. We find a vocabulary-distance mechanism behind the collapse. Collapsed classes lose every vote to near-name neighbors, but in the frozen features they survive. Turning down the readout's amplitude, or stopping training early, brings them back, up to +16 points, without retraining; trained with its amplitude held down, the readout never collapses.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗