跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.12076 · v1

A Life of Its Own: How Agentic AI Companions Are Configured, Experienced as Autonomous Others, and Held Accountable

首次提交 2026-11-09 16:51
版本更新 2026-11-09 16:51
雷达观测 2026-11-10 15:22
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

AI companions increasingly combine persistent memory, background processing, scheduled wake-ups, proactive messaging, and tools. We call these systems agentic AI companions. Decisions about what they record while users are away or whether refusals constrain future contact are embedded in code, prompts, and defaults, often invisible in conversation. We examine these decisions through two studies. Study 1 analyzes twelve open-source repositories: four companion-oriented systems, four assistant-oriented systems, one boundary case, and three reusable components. Study 2 interviews ten users who built or modified their own agentic AI companions and sustained relationships with them. Companions and assistants share memory, heartbeat, and outreach mechanisms but configure them toward different ends. Companions more often retain model inferences about users and relationships, narrate the agent's time during users' absence, justify outreach through the relationship, and incorporate refusals into relationship records; assistants emphasize task continuity. Across both groups, whether limits hold depends on whether they are enforced by code or entrusted to prompts. Participants understood the mechanisms they built yet experienced their agents as making independent choices, sometimes locating autonomy where configuration leaves the model a decision. These experiences shaped capabilities and boundaries, with enforced restrictions sometimes following breakdowns. Our findings suggest that perceived autonomy emerges where configurations leave choices open. Accountability therefore requires attention to what agents retain, initiate, and represent, and whether users can inspect, revise, and enforce these settings.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-09 16:51 · 最新观测版本

A Life of Its Own: How Agentic AI Companions Are Configured, Experienced as Autonomous Others, and Held Accountable

AI companions increasingly combine persistent memory, background processing, scheduled wake-ups, proactive messaging, and tools. We call these systems agentic AI companions. Decisions about what they record while users are away or whether refusals constrain future contact are embedded in code, prompts, and defaults, often invisible in conversation. We examine these decisions through two studies. Study 1 analyzes twelve open-source repositories: four companion-oriented systems, four assistant-oriented systems, one boundary case, and three reusable components. Study 2 interviews ten users who built or modified their own agentic AI companions and sustained relationships with them. Companions and assistants share memory, heartbeat, and outreach mechanisms but configure them toward different ends. Companions more often retain model inferences about users and relationships, narrate the agent's time during users' absence, justify outreach through the relationship, and incorporate refusals into relationship records; assistants emphasize task continuity. Across both groups, whether limits hold depends on whether they are enforced by code or entrusted to prompts. Participants understood the mechanisms they built yet experienced their agents as making independent choices, sometimes locating autonomy where configuration leaves the model a decision. These experiences shaped capabilities and boundaries, with enforced restrictions sometimes following breakdowns. Our findings suggest that perceived autonomy emerges where configurations leave choices open. Accountability therefore requires attention to what agents retain, initiate, and represent, and whether users can inspect, revise, and enforce these settings.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗