跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.12243 · v1

CADMA: Capacity-Aware Coverage Decomposition for Generative Model Assessment

首次提交 2026-11-09 19:31
版本更新 2026-11-09 19:31
雷达观测 2026-11-10 15:22
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Evaluating generative models requires measuring not only sample fidelity but also how well a generated set covers the real data distribution. Recent work has therefore introduced recall-oriented metrics for distribution-level evaluation. However, existing recall metrics often reduce distributional coverage to geometry-based coverage. This simplifying assumption weakens their diagnostic value and interpretability in two ways: these metrics provide only a single aggregate score that cannot distinguish essential diversity failures such as mode dropping and mode collapse, and geometry-based coverage can provide unreliable estimates by assigning high scores to poorly covered generative distributions. We therefore introduce CADMA, a capacity-aware framework for recall-oriented evaluation and diagnosis. CADMA evaluates distributional coverage through local capacity matching between real and generated samples, separating geometry-based coverage from effective coverage. This yields multi-dimensional coverage diagnostics that quantify mode dropping and mode collapse while reducing the overly optimistic estimates produced by geometry-based metrics. Through extensive experiments on toy data, real-world datasets, and generative models, we show that CADMA provides more reliable coverage estimates and more fine-grained, interpretable diagnostic signals of diversity failures than existing metrics. Our code is available at https://github.com/Open-Debin/CADMA_NeurIPS2026.

作者备注:Accepted at NeurIPS 2026

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-09 19:31 · 最新观测版本

CADMA: Capacity-Aware Coverage Decomposition for Generative Model Assessment

Evaluating generative models requires measuring not only sample fidelity but also how well a generated set covers the real data distribution. Recent work has therefore introduced recall-oriented metrics for distribution-level evaluation. However, existing recall metrics often reduce distributional coverage to geometry-based coverage. This simplifying assumption weakens their diagnostic value and interpretability in two ways: these metrics provide only a single aggregate score that cannot distinguish essential diversity failures such as mode dropping and mode collapse, and geometry-based coverage can provide unreliable estimates by assigning high scores to poorly covered generative distributions. We therefore introduce CADMA, a capacity-aware framework for recall-oriented evaluation and diagnosis. CADMA evaluates distributional coverage through local capacity matching between real and generated samples, separating geometry-based coverage from effective coverage. This yields multi-dimensional coverage diagnostics that quantify mode dropping and mode collapse while reducing the overly optimistic estimates produced by geometry-based metrics. Through extensive experiments on toy data, real-world datasets, and generative models, we show that CADMA provides more reliable coverage estimates and more fine-grained, interpretable diagnostic signals of diversity failures than existing metrics. Our code is available at https://github.com/Open-Debin/CADMA_NeurIPS2026.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗