跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.12466 · v1

Prediction with Foundation Models under Deployment Budgets

首次提交 2026-11-09 22:15
版本更新 2026-11-09 22:15
雷达观测 2026-11-10 15:22
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Foundation models can supply predictions for a downstream task that draw on knowledge from extensive pretraining, but they differ in task-specific accuracy and query cost. We develop a framework that improves prediction for the task under a budget on the average query cost per input, using training data to learn which models to query and how to combine their outputs with features available without querying. The first method queries the same models for every input; the second lets them vary across inputs and uses Q-learning to decide which model to query next and when to stop. For the first method, we show that several individually inaccurate outputs can jointly outperform the best single one. It attains the minimax rate when the regression function depends on the outputs only through models within the budget. Otherwise, any method within the budget can be forced to a slower rate, which the first method attains. For the second method, we show when varying the queried models across inputs strictly improves on querying the same models for every input, and bound its prediction risk and average cost in finite samples. In simulations and a multimodal laptop price application, both methods outperform existing methods.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-09 22:15 · 最新观测版本

Prediction with Foundation Models under Deployment Budgets

Foundation models can supply predictions for a downstream task that draw on knowledge from extensive pretraining, but they differ in task-specific accuracy and query cost. We develop a framework that improves prediction for the task under a budget on the average query cost per input, using training data to learn which models to query and how to combine their outputs with features available without querying. The first method queries the same models for every input; the second lets them vary across inputs and uses Q-learning to decide which model to query next and when to stop. For the first method, we show that several individually inaccurate outputs can jointly outperform the best single one. It attains the minimax rate when the regression function depends on the outputs only through models within the budget. Otherwise, any method within the budget can be forced to a slower rate, which the first method attains. For the second method, we show when varying the queried models across inputs strictly improves on querying the same models for every input, and bound its prediction risk and average cost in finite samples. In simulations and a multimodal laptop price application, both methods outperform existing methods.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗