跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.12491 · v1

Out-of-the-Box Tabular Foundation Models for Bayesian Optimization in Materials Discovery

首次提交 2026-11-09 22:40
版本更新 2026-11-09 22:40
雷达观测 2026-11-10 15:22
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Bayesian optimization is widely used in active learning loops for materials science. Gaussian processes serve as the de-facto surrogate model family, but require task-dependent kernel choices and can lack the modeling capacity for complex relationships. Tabular foundation models (TFMs) have recently emerged as the state-of-the-art for predictive tasks on structured data, without requiring bespoke kernels or hyperparameter tuning. We evaluate two TFMs, TabPFN and TabICL, as out-of-the-box surrogate models on two standard materials science benchmarks, comparing against a large field of baselines encompassing Gaussian processes, random forests, and CatBoost. Our findings indicate that TFMs are highly competitive surrogate models across the two benchmarks, without task-specific training for active learning or GP kernel selection. Our results motivate developing TFMs further as surrogates for active learning in materials discovery.

作者备注:Accepted at the AI4Mat Workshop at NeurIPS 2026. 19 pages, 12 figures, 5 tables. Code: https://github.com/PriorLabs/matsci-bo-bench

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-09 22:40 · 最新观测版本

Out-of-the-Box Tabular Foundation Models for Bayesian Optimization in Materials Discovery

Bayesian optimization is widely used in active learning loops for materials science. Gaussian processes serve as the de-facto surrogate model family, but require task-dependent kernel choices and can lack the modeling capacity for complex relationships. Tabular foundation models (TFMs) have recently emerged as the state-of-the-art for predictive tasks on structured data, without requiring bespoke kernels or hyperparameter tuning. We evaluate two TFMs, TabPFN and TabICL, as out-of-the-box surrogate models on two standard materials science benchmarks, comparing against a large field of baselines encompassing Gaussian processes, random forests, and CatBoost. Our findings indicate that TFMs are highly competitive surrogate models across the two benchmarks, without task-specific training for active learning or GP kernel selection. Our results motivate developing TFMs further as surrogates for active learning in materials discovery.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗