跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.12532 · v1

ML Models Are Not Ciphers: Power Analysis for Weight Extraction Is Harder Than You Think

首次提交 2026-11-09 23:06
版本更新 2026-11-09 23:06
雷达观测 2026-11-10 15:22
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Can power-analysis techniques reveal secret weights of machine-learning models? Multiple recent works demonstrate proof-of-concept attacks that can partially recover such weights. To that end, these works build on techniques from cryptographic engineering, treating the model as a ``cipher'' and its secret weights as keys. We question the basic assumption behind such straightforward adaptations of cryptographic attacks and highlight the challenges arising when applying past techniques to fully recover all layers of deep neural networks. Unlike past works, which extract only a few weights, typically from shallow layers, we investigate the recovery of complete networks. Moreover, we target fully trained and functional models, rather than untrained, randomly initialized networks. To focus on fundamental challenges, we assume an unrealistically strong side-channel adversary that can directly observe the output of the leakage model without any added noise. With this adversary, we show that machine-learning models differ significantly from cryptographic implementations, giving rise to unique challenges that have not been observed in the prior art. We observe two main differences between machine-learning models and ciphers. First, in contrast to the high-diffusion nonlinear integer arithmetic prevalent in cryptographic schemes, machine-learning models tend to use limited-precision floating-point arithmetic and low-diffusion linear operations. We show that these operations introduce difficulties in weight recovery, often requiring an unexpectedly large number of traces, even under ideal channel conditions. Second, we observe that, unlike ciphers, which aim to increase the data entropy, machine-learning models aim to reduce it. This reduces data variability as the algorithm progresses, hampering weight recovery in deep layers of the model. (details can be found in the paper)

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-09 23:06 · 最新观测版本

ML Models Are Not Ciphers: Power Analysis for Weight Extraction Is Harder Than You Think

Can power-analysis techniques reveal secret weights of machine-learning models? Multiple recent works demonstrate proof-of-concept attacks that can partially recover such weights. To that end, these works build on techniques from cryptographic engineering, treating the model as a ``cipher'' and its secret weights as keys. We question the basic assumption behind such straightforward adaptations of cryptographic attacks and highlight the challenges arising when applying past techniques to fully recover all layers of deep neural networks. Unlike past works, which extract only a few weights, typically from shallow layers, we investigate the recovery of complete networks. Moreover, we target fully trained and functional models, rather than untrained, randomly initialized networks. To focus on fundamental challenges, we assume an unrealistically strong side-channel adversary that can directly observe the output of the leakage model without any added noise. With this adversary, we show that machine-learning models differ significantly from cryptographic implementations, giving rise to unique challenges that have not been observed in the prior art. We observe two main differences between machine-learning models and ciphers. First, in contrast to the high-diffusion nonlinear integer arithmetic prevalent in cryptographic schemes, machine-learning models tend to use limited-precision floating-point arithmetic and low-diffusion linear operations. We show that these operations introduce difficulties in weight recovery, often requiring an unexpectedly large number of traces, even under ideal channel conditions. Second, we observe that, unlike ciphers, which aim to increase the data entropy, machine-learning models aim to reduce it. This reduces data variability as the algorithm progresses, hampering weight recovery in deep layers of the model. (details can be found in the paper)

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗