跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.13003 · v1

Branch-and-Commit for Frozen RL Agents: When and Where to Spend Test-Time Compute

首次提交 2026-11-09 00:57
版本更新 2026-11-09 00:57
雷达观测 2026-11-11 11:05
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Reinforcement learning agents are often deployed with policies that cannot be retrained or modified. In digital environments whose states can be copied and resumed, an operator has another option: sample several continuations from the current state, evaluate them, and continue from the endpoint of the selected branch. We call this procedure branch-and-commit. We study when it improves return, what produces the improvement, and where its computational budget should be spent. Across four environments, two frozen policies, five continuation verifiers, and a model-free selection rule, we find that the benefit of branching depends on dispersion: the difference between the best candidate return and the mean candidate return. Branching provides no benefit in low-dispersion settings, while increasing return by 12.8% in our main Craftax-Medium setting. Most of this gain comes not from selecting better actions, but from selecting among different stochastic realizations of the same action. Several competent verifiers achieve similar episode returns, suggesting that verifier quality is not the main constraint at our operating budget. Instead, computation is better allocated to states where useful dispersion is likely. On held-out seeds, gating branching using predicted dispersion retains 69% of the improvement from uniform branching while using 48% as many branching calls. These results characterize when branch-and-commit is useful and clarify what its gains represent.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-09 00:57 · 最新观测版本

Branch-and-Commit for Frozen RL Agents: When and Where to Spend Test-Time Compute

Reinforcement learning agents are often deployed with policies that cannot be retrained or modified. In digital environments whose states can be copied and resumed, an operator has another option: sample several continuations from the current state, evaluate them, and continue from the endpoint of the selected branch. We call this procedure branch-and-commit. We study when it improves return, what produces the improvement, and where its computational budget should be spent. Across four environments, two frozen policies, five continuation verifiers, and a model-free selection rule, we find that the benefit of branching depends on dispersion: the difference between the best candidate return and the mean candidate return. Branching provides no benefit in low-dispersion settings, while increasing return by 12.8% in our main Craftax-Medium setting. Most of this gain comes not from selecting better actions, but from selecting among different stochastic realizations of the same action. Several competent verifiers achieve similar episode returns, suggesting that verifier quality is not the main constraint at our operating budget. Instead, computation is better allocated to states where useful dispersion is likely. On held-out seeds, gating branching using predicted dispersion retains 69% of the improvement from uniform branching while using 48% as many branching calls. These results characterize when branch-and-commit is useful and clarify what its gains represent.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗