跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.13024 · v1

GRAP: Gender Rubric-Aware Probing for Analyzing Gender Bias in LLMs

首次提交 2026-11-09 16:09
版本更新 2026-11-09 16:09
雷达观测 2026-11-11 11:05
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

As LLMs increasingly mediate everyday interactions, subtle gender biases in open-ended responses pose growing societal risks. Existing probing methods have two key limitations: they rely on fixed-format tasks, such as pronoun resolution or occupation association, that alignment-tuned models can easily handle; and they compare raw group-level rubric scores, ignoring per-dimension variance and obscuring which bias dimensions reliably distinguish gender groups. We introduce GRAP (Gender Rubric-Aware Probing), a framework that uses a lightweight logistic probe to identify the most discriminative bias dimensions from responses scored across 10 rubric dimensions, operating task-agnostically on open-ended instruction following.

作者备注:3 pages. Accepted at the ECML-PKDD 2026 Workshop on Bias and Fairness in AI

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-09 16:09 · 最新观测版本

GRAP: Gender Rubric-Aware Probing for Analyzing Gender Bias in LLMs

As LLMs increasingly mediate everyday interactions, subtle gender biases in open-ended responses pose growing societal risks. Existing probing methods have two key limitations: they rely on fixed-format tasks, such as pronoun resolution or occupation association, that alignment-tuned models can easily handle; and they compare raw group-level rubric scores, ignoring per-dimension variance and obscuring which bias dimensions reliably distinguish gender groups. We introduce GRAP (Gender Rubric-Aware Probing), a framework that uses a lightweight logistic probe to identify the most discriminative bias dimensions from responses scored across 10 rubric dimensions, operating task-agnostically on open-ended instruction following.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗