跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.13030 · v1

APS-VLA: Action-Guided and Future-Aware Token Pruning for Efficient Vision-Language-Action Models

首次提交 2026-11-09 17:28
版本更新 2026-11-09 17:28
雷达观测 2026-11-11 11:05
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies have demonstrated strong generalization in robotic manipulation, yet processing dense visual tokens often incurs high inference latency. Visual token pruning offers a practical way to reduce this cost, but identifying a compact set of tokens that preserves reliable action generation remains challenging. Existing methods largely rely on static or immediate heuristic cues to estimate token importance. We introduce APS-VLA, a framework that learns visual token selection from robot demonstrations while keeping the pretrained VLA backbone frozen. A lightweight Decision Influence Estimator scores tokens conditioned on current visual observations, language instructions, and robot proprioception. Its training combines two complementary signals: action supervision matches both the full-input policy predictions and demonstrated actions, while an auxiliary visual transition objective uses demonstrated actions to predict subsequent visual features from the selected representation. At deployment, the estimator performs a single hard selection and packing step before the policy's native action-generation procedure; the auxiliary predictor is removed. Experiments with OpenVLA-OFT on LIBERO and with $π_{0.5}$ and XR-1 on RoboCasa365 demonstrate inference acceleration with modest changes in task success. Across five real-world tasks on two dual-arm platforms, APS-VLA reduces mean policy inference latency from 137.25 to 93.25 ms, achieving a $1.47\times$ speedup with an average success rate of 61%, compared with 60% for the unpruned baseline. Together, these results support APS-VLA as a modular, plug-in framework for efficient robotic control across VLA architectures, preserving the underlying policy parameters and native action-generation procedure.

作者备注:11 pages, 6 figures, 6 tables

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-09 17:28 · 最新观测版本

APS-VLA: Action-Guided and Future-Aware Token Pruning for Efficient Vision-Language-Action Models

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies have demonstrated strong generalization in robotic manipulation, yet processing dense visual tokens often incurs high inference latency. Visual token pruning offers a practical way to reduce this cost, but identifying a compact set of tokens that preserves reliable action generation remains challenging. Existing methods largely rely on static or immediate heuristic cues to estimate token importance. We introduce APS-VLA, a framework that learns visual token selection from robot demonstrations while keeping the pretrained VLA backbone frozen. A lightweight Decision Influence Estimator scores tokens conditioned on current visual observations, language instructions, and robot proprioception. Its training combines two complementary signals: action supervision matches both the full-input policy predictions and demonstrated actions, while an auxiliary visual transition objective uses demonstrated actions to predict subsequent visual features from the selected representation. At deployment, the estimator performs a single hard selection and packing step before the policy's native action-generation procedure; the auxiliary predictor is removed. Experiments with OpenVLA-OFT on LIBERO and with $π_{0.5}$ and XR-1 on RoboCasa365 demonstrate inference acceleration with modest changes in task success. Across five real-world tasks on two dual-arm platforms, APS-VLA reduces mean policy inference latency from 137.25 to 93.25 ms, achieving a $1.47\times$ speedup with an average success rate of 61%, compared with 60% for the unpruned baseline. Together, these results support APS-VLA as a modular, plug-in framework for efficient robotic control across VLA architectures, preserving the underlying policy parameters and native action-generation procedure.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗