← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2611.13034 · v1
RoboACE: Adversarial Co-Evolution for Robot Self-Improvement
首次提交 2026-11-09 18:29
版本更新 2026-11-09 18:29
雷达观测 2026-11-11 11:05
摘要
Robot agents can improve reusable skills, planning procedures, and recovery strategies from execution feedback, yet a fixed practice source leaves the search for new weaknesses unchanged. Useful practice depends on the agent's current capabilities, so the procedure that chooses practice must also be revisable. We present RoboACE (Robot Adversarial Co-Evolution), a framework that jointly evolves curriculum and execution harnesses around frozen foundation models. The curriculum harness uses accumulated capability evidence to propose informative challenges, while the execution harness responds with reusable revisions that expand execution capabilities. Alternating updates hold one side fixed as the other changes, and admitted challenges form fixed snapshots for comparing execution revisions. Starting from a compact set of LIBERO practice conditions, the resulting frozen deployment outperforms the evaluated controllers and agent systems across four LIBERO-family panels. On LIBERO-PRO, it reaches 74.0% success, exceeding the initial deployment by 15.0 percentage points and direct execution by its VLA controller by 13.5 points. Case studies document changes to evidence-guided practice selection, drawer-skill grounding, and controller intervention.
作者备注：13 pages, 5 figures
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v1 · 2026-11-09 18:29 · 最新观测版本
RoboACE: Adversarial Co-Evolution for Robot Self-Improvement
Robot agents can improve reusable skills, planning procedures, and recovery strategies from execution feedback, yet a fixed practice source leaves the search for new weaknesses unchanged. Useful practice depends on the agent's current capabilities, so the procedure that chooses practice must also be revisable. We present RoboACE (Robot Adversarial Co-Evolution), a framework that jointly evolves curriculum and execution harnesses around frozen foundation models. The curriculum harness uses accumulated capability evidence to propose informative challenges, while the execution harness responds with reusable revisions that expand execution capabilities. Alternating updates hold one side fixed as the other changes, and admitted challenges form fixed snapshots for comparing execution revisions. Starting from a compact set of LIBERO practice conditions, the resulting frozen deployment outperforms the evaluated controllers and agent systems across four LIBERO-family panels. On LIBERO-PRO, it reaches 74.0% success, exceeding the initial deployment by 15.0 percentage points and direct execution by its VLA controller by 13.5 points. Case studies document changes to evidence-guided practice selection, drawer-skill grounding, and controller intervention.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗