跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.13216 · v1

Latin American Studies since the 1980s: From Apocalyptic Dreams to Assimilationist Consolidation

首次提交 2026-11-10 04:38
版本更新 2026-11-10 04:38
雷达观测 2026-11-11 11:04
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

We investigate how Latin American Studies (LAS) has evolved since 1982 in three leading LAS journals. Using network analysis, text mining, and bibliometrics, we trace transformations in disciplinary positioning, authorship, and citation patterns. Our main claim is that LAS has undergone an assimilationist consolidation. The field is now institutionally recognisable, with core LAS journals occupying central positions in disciplinary networks and acting as bridges across fields. Yet this consolidation has reinforced hierarchies privileging Anglophone academic norms. Journals based in Latin America, once central, have been marginalised. The share of Latin American authors has grown, but their profiles converge towards Northern standards.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-10 04:38 · 最新观测版本

Latin American Studies since the 1980s: From Apocalyptic Dreams to Assimilationist Consolidation

We investigate how Latin American Studies (LAS) has evolved since 1982 in three leading LAS journals. Using network analysis, text mining, and bibliometrics, we trace transformations in disciplinary positioning, authorship, and citation patterns. Our main claim is that LAS has undergone an assimilationist consolidation. The field is now institutionally recognisable, with core LAS journals occupying central positions in disciplinary networks and acting as bridges across fields. Yet this consolidation has reinforced hierarchies privileging Anglophone academic norms. Journals based in Latin America, once central, have been marginalised. The share of Latin American authors has grown, but their profiles converge towards Northern standards.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗