← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2611.13336 · v1
Veritas: A Verifier Generation Harness for Agent Tasks
首次提交 2026-11-10 07:01
版本更新 2026-11-10 07:01
雷达观测 2026-11-11 11:04
摘要
The effectiveness of a self-improving system relies heavily on the quality of its verifier, which judges the outcome of each improvement round. However, the verifiers of most tasks are written by hand, which is expensive and does not scale to tasks that come without one. We propose Veritas, a harness that generates verifiers automatically. Unlike general-purpose agent harnesses, Veritas adds three mechanisms for verifier generation: an evidence header stating what the verifier will observe, a library of domain rules that tasks leave unstated, and authoring principles, partly refined by a self-improvement loop. We evaluate on six benchmarks: four scored by execution, whose official verifiers we first certify, and two that compare pairs of responses. With the model fixed, the verifiers Veritas generates agree better with the official verdicts than those of seven other harnesses on all four execution-scored benchmarks. On the two pairwise benchmarks they are at or near the best. They also agree better than those of the vendor's own harness for two of three other model families. Its mechanisms also improve 9 of 12 harness-benchmark pairs scored by execution across three harnesses.
作者备注：31 pages, 1 figure
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v1 · 2026-11-10 07:01 · 最新观测版本
Veritas: A Verifier Generation Harness for Agent Tasks
The effectiveness of a self-improving system relies heavily on the quality of its verifier, which judges the outcome of each improvement round. However, the verifiers of most tasks are written by hand, which is expensive and does not scale to tasks that come without one. We propose Veritas, a harness that generates verifiers automatically. Unlike general-purpose agent harnesses, Veritas adds three mechanisms for verifier generation: an evidence header stating what the verifier will observe, a library of domain rules that tasks leave unstated, and authoring principles, partly refined by a self-improvement loop. We evaluate on six benchmarks: four scored by execution, whose official verifiers we first certify, and two that compare pairs of responses. With the model fixed, the verifiers Veritas generates agree better with the official verdicts than those of seven other harnesses on all four execution-scored benchmarks. On the two pairwise benchmarks they are at or near the best. They also agree better than those of the vendor's own harness for two of three other model families. Its mechanisms also improve 9 of 12 harness-benchmark pairs scored by execution across three harnesses.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗