跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.14026 · v1

Energy-Proportional Serverless Computing on SBC Clusters

首次提交 2026-11-10 20:57
版本更新 2026-11-10 20:57
雷达观测 2026-11-11 11:04
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Serverless computing promises to run code only on demand, yet the servers beneath it draw most of their power while idle, so energy consumption does not scale to zero with the workload. We show that the statelessness of serverless functions makes it possible to extend scale-to-zero from function instances to physical nodes, enabling energy proportionality. Our platform, built on tinyFaaS for clusters of single-board computers, treats node power state as part of worker selection, powering workers off when idle and back on under load. On a physical cluster, our approach reduces mean power draw by 39.6 % on a bursty, trace-based workload and by 46.7 % on a sparse one, without a detectable change in median latency on the bursty workload. The cost lands in the tail, where invocations that arrive while all workers are off wait about a minute for a node to boot. Under continuous load, the platform behaves like an always-on cluster.

作者备注:Accepted for publication at the 4th International Workshop on Middleware for the Computing Continuum (Mid4CC '26)

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-10 20:57 · 最新观测版本

Energy-Proportional Serverless Computing on SBC Clusters

Serverless computing promises to run code only on demand, yet the servers beneath it draw most of their power while idle, so energy consumption does not scale to zero with the workload. We show that the statelessness of serverless functions makes it possible to extend scale-to-zero from function instances to physical nodes, enabling energy proportionality. Our platform, built on tinyFaaS for clusters of single-board computers, treats node power state as part of worker selection, powering workers off when idle and back on under load. On a physical cluster, our approach reduces mean power draw by 39.6 % on a bursty, trace-based workload and by 46.7 % on a sparse one, without a detectable change in median latency on the bursty workload. The cost lands in the tail, where invocations that arrive while all workers are off wait about a minute for a node to boot. Under continuous load, the platform behaves like an always-on cluster.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗