跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.14389 · v1

Evaluating Tactile Encoding Strategies for Communicating 3-D Shape

首次提交 2026-11-11 01:40
版本更新 2026-11-11 01:40
雷达观测 2026-11-11 13:07
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Two-dimensional haptic displays, such as programmable pin arrays and vibrotactile or friction-modulating touchscreens, enable tactile communication of complex shapes in a low-profile form factor. However, many shapes of interest, including CAD models, three-dimensional graphs, and map topographies, are inherently three-dimensional. This work investigates two methods for encoding 3-D information using a 2-D tactile display: (1) a single tactile height map providing coarse but quantifiable depth cues, and (2) a series of binary layers communicating sequential slices of a 3-D model, supporting more complex geometries such as overhangs and cavities. We further compare performance across two display types--a friction-modulating display and a pin array--to examine how the level of haptic abstraction affects users' ability to decode discrete 3-D information. A user study demonstrates that participants were able to effectively complete a 3-D assembly task using both strategies, achieving high accuracy across all display types. While the pin array supported faster task completion and higher-rated--though not statistically significant--user experience than the friction-modulating display for the binary-layer task, these differences did not translate to significant differences in overall usability (i.e., reassembly accuracy success). Together, these results identify design trade-offs and inform development of future surface haptic displays that support the communication and interpretation of discrete 3-D information in tactile graphics.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

比较两种在二维触觉显示器上编码三维形状的方法(单层高度图与二值分层切片),并对比摩擦调制显示屏与针阵列的表现。

正在读取账号与研究记录…

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-11 01:40 · 最新观测版本

Evaluating Tactile Encoding Strategies for Communicating 3-D Shape

Two-dimensional haptic displays, such as programmable pin arrays and vibrotactile or friction-modulating touchscreens, enable tactile communication of complex shapes in a low-profile form factor. However, many shapes of interest, including CAD models, three-dimensional graphs, and map topographies, are inherently three-dimensional. This work investigates two methods for encoding 3-D information using a 2-D tactile display: (1) a single tactile height map providing coarse but quantifiable depth cues, and (2) a series of binary layers communicating sequential slices of a 3-D model, supporting more complex geometries such as overhangs and cavities. We further compare performance across two display types--a friction-modulating display and a pin array--to examine how the level of haptic abstraction affects users' ability to decode discrete 3-D information. A user study demonstrates that participants were able to effectively complete a 3-D assembly task using both strategies, achieving high accuracy across all display types. While the pin array supported faster task completion and higher-rated--though not statistically significant--user experience than the friction-modulating display for the binary-layer task, these differences did not translate to significant differences in overall usability (i.e., reassembly accuracy success). Together, these results identify design trade-offs and inform development of future surface haptic displays that support the communication and interpretation of discrete 3-D information in tactile graphics.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗