跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.14590 · v1

An Asynchronous Federated Learning Platform for Lung Adenocarcinoma Grading via Foundation Models and Structural Pruning

首次提交 2026-11-10 15:56
版本更新 2026-11-10 15:56
雷达观测 2026-11-13 10:10
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Classification of lung adenocarcinoma into poorly differentiated (PD) and well-to-moderately differentiated (WMD) subtypes plays an important role in patient survival; however, consistent classification is difficult due to inter-observer variability among pathologists. Collecting data from multiple hospitals is also challenging due to patient privacy concerns. This study proposes a web-based federated learning system that shares only locally trained model weights without sharing patient data between institutions. The UNI2 foundation model and CLAM-SB were used to classify pathological whole slide images. A four-client federated learning system was constructed, and the NLST cohort was reserved exclusively for external validation. In centralized evaluation, joint training with CPTAC and TCGA outperformed single-institution training on external validation, confirming the necessity of multi-institutional data integration. FedAvg, FedProx, FedBN, and FedNova were compared as federated learning algorithms under identical experimental conditions. Test AUC ranked as FedBN, FedProx, FedNova, and FedAvg. FedNova showed the most balanced classification performance between PD and WMD. L1-norm structural pruning at 20%, 30%, and 40% sparsity was applied to reduce model transmission size. FedAvg, FedProx, and FedBN showed a tendency of decreasing Test AUC under pruning, while FedNova achieved improved Test AUC across all sparsity levels. A web-based application was developed supporting slide upload, local training, AI classification, and attention heatmap-based visualization. The combination of FedNova and 40% pruning was confirmed as a practical approach that improves communication efficiency and classification performance while protecting patient privacy.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-10 15:56 · 最新观测版本

An Asynchronous Federated Learning Platform for Lung Adenocarcinoma Grading via Foundation Models and Structural Pruning

Classification of lung adenocarcinoma into poorly differentiated (PD) and well-to-moderately differentiated (WMD) subtypes plays an important role in patient survival; however, consistent classification is difficult due to inter-observer variability among pathologists. Collecting data from multiple hospitals is also challenging due to patient privacy concerns. This study proposes a web-based federated learning system that shares only locally trained model weights without sharing patient data between institutions. The UNI2 foundation model and CLAM-SB were used to classify pathological whole slide images. A four-client federated learning system was constructed, and the NLST cohort was reserved exclusively for external validation. In centralized evaluation, joint training with CPTAC and TCGA outperformed single-institution training on external validation, confirming the necessity of multi-institutional data integration. FedAvg, FedProx, FedBN, and FedNova were compared as federated learning algorithms under identical experimental conditions. Test AUC ranked as FedBN, FedProx, FedNova, and FedAvg. FedNova showed the most balanced classification performance between PD and WMD. L1-norm structural pruning at 20%, 30%, and 40% sparsity was applied to reduce model transmission size. FedAvg, FedProx, and FedBN showed a tendency of decreasing Test AUC under pruning, while FedNova achieved improved Test AUC across all sparsity levels. A web-based application was developed supporting slide upload, local training, AI classification, and attention heatmap-based visualization. The combination of FedNova and 40% pruning was confirmed as a practical approach that improves communication efficiency and classification performance while protecting patient privacy.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗