跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.14861 · v1

Is Jev a Good Multilingual Judge?

首次提交 2026-11-11 08:21
版本更新 2026-11-11 08:21
雷达观测 2026-11-13 10:09
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Generative large language models are widely used for multilingual text evaluation, yet whether decision models that directly output judgment probabilities can serve as multilingual judges has received limited attention. We evaluate Jev against generative LLM judges on four multilingual benchmarks with human annotations, covering up to 47 language varieties and three evaluation formats: binary decisions, pairwise comparisons, and graded ratings. At approximately $1/31$ to $1/61$ of GPT-6.1's evaluation cost, Jev is competitive on most multilingual judging tasks, but falls behind GPT-6.1 on knowledge-intensive answer verification. Further analysis shows that Jev is more likely to accept incorrect answers in low-resource languages than in English and that its probability outputs help identify errors across tasks. Based on these findings, we offer recommendations on evaluation instructions, confidence-based selection, and model routing, providing empirical guidance for using Jev as a multilingual judge.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-11 08:21 · 最新观测版本

Is Jev a Good Multilingual Judge?

Generative large language models are widely used for multilingual text evaluation, yet whether decision models that directly output judgment probabilities can serve as multilingual judges has received limited attention. We evaluate Jev against generative LLM judges on four multilingual benchmarks with human annotations, covering up to 47 language varieties and three evaluation formats: binary decisions, pairwise comparisons, and graded ratings. At approximately $1/31$ to $1/61$ of GPT-6.1's evaluation cost, Jev is competitive on most multilingual judging tasks, but falls behind GPT-6.1 on knowledge-intensive answer verification. Further analysis shows that Jev is more likely to accept incorrect answers in low-resource languages than in English and that its probability outputs help identify errors across tasks. Based on these findings, we offer recommendations on evaluation instructions, confidence-based selection, and model routing, providing empirical guidance for using Jev as a multilingual judge.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗