跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.15342 · v1

MechBench: A Domain-Specific LLM Benchmark for Parallel Mechanisms

首次提交 2026-11-11 19:20
版本更新 2026-11-11 19:20
雷达观测 2026-11-13 11:11
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Parallel mechanisms pose distinctive challenges to large language models (LLMs), as valid reasoning depends jointly on mechanism topology, loop closure, geometry, joint types, and modeling assumptions. Yet existing LLM benchmarks provide little systematic coverage of such domain-specific knowledge, constraint-sensitive analysis, and constructive design. To fill this gap, we introduce MECHBENCH, a 2,541-question benchmark for evaluating LLMs in parallel mechanisms across professional knowledge, mechanism analysis, and design. MECHBENCH contains standard and challenge tiers spanning six capability categories and nine executable analysis and design tasks. It is constructed through MECHFORGE, a domain-grounded framework that combines expert-organized knowledge, LLM-assisted question generation, programmatic instance generation, two-stage expert review, and task-aware scoring with exact matching, rubric-based evaluation, and program verification. We further develop MECHGPT as a diagnostic domain-adapted model. Experiments show that strong knowledge performance does not directly translate into executable mechanism reasoning: leading closed-service models achieve over 95 on the standard tier but only 47-60 on the challenge tier, while domain adaptation substantially improves MechGPT over its Qwen3-8B baselines but leaves a large gap in constrained analysis and design. These results establish MECHBENCH as a systematic testbed for measuring domain-specific LLM capabilities in mechanism science.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-11 19:20 · 最新观测版本

MechBench: A Domain-Specific LLM Benchmark for Parallel Mechanisms

Parallel mechanisms pose distinctive challenges to large language models (LLMs), as valid reasoning depends jointly on mechanism topology, loop closure, geometry, joint types, and modeling assumptions. Yet existing LLM benchmarks provide little systematic coverage of such domain-specific knowledge, constraint-sensitive analysis, and constructive design. To fill this gap, we introduce MECHBENCH, a 2,541-question benchmark for evaluating LLMs in parallel mechanisms across professional knowledge, mechanism analysis, and design. MECHBENCH contains standard and challenge tiers spanning six capability categories and nine executable analysis and design tasks. It is constructed through MECHFORGE, a domain-grounded framework that combines expert-organized knowledge, LLM-assisted question generation, programmatic instance generation, two-stage expert review, and task-aware scoring with exact matching, rubric-based evaluation, and program verification. We further develop MECHGPT as a diagnostic domain-adapted model. Experiments show that strong knowledge performance does not directly translate into executable mechanism reasoning: leading closed-service models achieve over 95 on the standard tier but only 47-60 on the challenge tier, while domain adaptation substantially improves MechGPT over its Qwen3-8B baselines but leaves a large gap in constrained analysis and design. These results establish MECHBENCH as a systematic testbed for measuring domain-specific LLM capabilities in mechanism science.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗