跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.15348 · v1

Breath-Dx: A Time Series Classification Benchmark for Disease Screening with eNose

首次提交 2026-11-11 19:25
版本更新 2026-11-11 19:25
雷达观测 2026-11-13 11:11
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Electronic nose (eNose) technology offers a portable, non-invasive route for disease screening via exhaled breath analysis. However, progress in the field is hindered by the lack of systematic benchmarks that compare machine learning methods under realistic conditions, particularly sensor drift, a known but rarely quantified failure mode. Most existing studies rely on small, private datasets with inconsistent protocols, rendering results non-comparable and slowing progress. We introduce Breath-Dx, the first comprehensive benchmark of time series classification methods for breath-based disease screening. Our work leverages the Scent of Health (S-OH) dataset, the largest public clinical eNose collection to date, comprising 1,234 patients across nine diagnostic groups, each providing a 17-channel multivariate time series with explicit temporal train/test splits that account for sensor drift. We systematically evaluate 10 methods spanning four families: feature-based tabular learners, convolution-based models, graph-based, and time series architectures. All methods degrade significantly under temporal validation (0.05-0.12 AUC drop compared to random cross-validation), confirming that drift embeds a strong temporal signal. Under this realistic evaluation, the best methods achieve ROC AUC of 0.74-0.76 for some lung conditions, though others remain near chance. Recurrent architectures show the most consistent performance across diseases, while specialized time series methods achieve the highest peak results. Demographic confounders matter: breath signals provide independent diagnostic value for some conditions but add little beyond age for others. We release the S-OH dataset, all temporal splits, evaluation protocols, and code to enable reproducible research and accelerate progress in clinical breathomics.

作者备注:IEEE ICDM 2026 - Best Paper Runner-Up (Applied Track)

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-11 19:25 · 最新观测版本

Breath-Dx: A Time Series Classification Benchmark for Disease Screening with eNose

Electronic nose (eNose) technology offers a portable, non-invasive route for disease screening via exhaled breath analysis. However, progress in the field is hindered by the lack of systematic benchmarks that compare machine learning methods under realistic conditions, particularly sensor drift, a known but rarely quantified failure mode. Most existing studies rely on small, private datasets with inconsistent protocols, rendering results non-comparable and slowing progress. We introduce Breath-Dx, the first comprehensive benchmark of time series classification methods for breath-based disease screening. Our work leverages the Scent of Health (S-OH) dataset, the largest public clinical eNose collection to date, comprising 1,234 patients across nine diagnostic groups, each providing a 17-channel multivariate time series with explicit temporal train/test splits that account for sensor drift. We systematically evaluate 10 methods spanning four families: feature-based tabular learners, convolution-based models, graph-based, and time series architectures. All methods degrade significantly under temporal validation (0.05-0.12 AUC drop compared to random cross-validation), confirming that drift embeds a strong temporal signal. Under this realistic evaluation, the best methods achieve ROC AUC of 0.74-0.76 for some lung conditions, though others remain near chance. Recurrent architectures show the most consistent performance across diseases, while specialized time series methods achieve the highest peak results. Demographic confounders matter: breath signals provide independent diagnostic value for some conditions but add little beyond age for others. We release the S-OH dataset, all temporal splits, evaluation protocols, and code to enable reproducible research and accelerate progress in clinical breathomics.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗