跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.15479 · v1

DETER: Suppression During Pretraining for Tamper Resistance

首次提交 2026-11-11 21:43
版本更新 2026-11-11 21:43
雷达观测 2026-11-13 11:11
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Open-weight language models can acquire knowledge that could enable biological, chemical, or cyber misuse. Any attempt to limit such knowledge must remain effective after the model weights are released and can be fine-tuned. Unlearning applied after pretraining can be rapidly undone, whereas filtering the pretraining corpus offers greater resistance. We ask whether actively suppressing knowledge during pretraining can further increase the fine-tuning required to acquire it. Even simple gradient ascent interleaved with standard pretraining on the filtered corpus makes medical knowledge harder to acquire through adversarial fine-tuning than filtering alone or post-hoc unlearning. At 1B parameters, reaching the held-out PubMed loss of an unfiltered model requires over 20×\times as many PubMed fine-tuning tokens as after filtering alone. Retained knowledge is evaluated using both held-out data and downstream tasks. Across model sizes, varying suppression strength reveals an increasingly favorable trade-off between fine-tuning difficulty and held-out loss on retained pretraining data. These results point to pretraining as an effective stage for making unwanted capabilities harder to acquire through subsequent fine-tuning. Code is available at \href{https://github.com/MEGlr/DETER}{\texttt{github.com/MEGlr/DETER}}.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-11 21:43 · 最新观测版本

DETER: Suppression During Pretraining for Tamper Resistance

Open-weight language models can acquire knowledge that could enable biological, chemical, or cyber misuse. Any attempt to limit such knowledge must remain effective after the model weights are released and can be fine-tuned. Unlearning applied after pretraining can be rapidly undone, whereas filtering the pretraining corpus offers greater resistance. We ask whether actively suppressing knowledge during pretraining can further increase the fine-tuning required to acquire it. Even simple gradient ascent interleaved with standard pretraining on the filtered corpus makes medical knowledge harder to acquire through adversarial fine-tuning than filtering alone or post-hoc unlearning. At 1B parameters, reaching the held-out PubMed loss of an unfiltered model requires over 20×\times as many PubMed fine-tuning tokens as after filtering alone. Retained knowledge is evaluated using both held-out data and downstream tasks. Across model sizes, varying suppression strength reveals an increasingly favorable trade-off between fine-tuning difficulty and held-out loss on retained pretraining data. These results point to pretraining as an effective stage for making unwanted capabilities harder to acquire through subsequent fine-tuning. Code is available at \href{https://github.com/MEGlr/DETER}{\texttt{github.com/MEGlr/DETER}}.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗