← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2611.15522 · v1
GHAgentCI: A Dataset of Coding-Agent Invocations in CI Workflow Histories
首次提交 2026-11-11 22:13
版本更新 2026-11-11 22:13
雷达观测 2026-11-13 11:11
摘要
Coding agents are increasingly integrated into GitHub Actions to review pull requests, triage issues and modify code. Identifying these integrations is challenging because agentic workflows often resemble ordinary CI files, with evidence appearing in action references, shell commands and workflow conventions. We present GHAgentCI, a dataset of 15K+ workflow histories from 6K+ of 196K+ mined GitHub repositories, comprising 159K+ revisions and 205K+ agent-evidence records linked to workflow triggers and declared execution constraints. Our open-source extractor, cai-miner, detects agent-related evidence using an extensible catalogue. Manual validation of 576 stratified records confirmed 96.1% of dedicated-action matches and 98.8% of GitHub Agentic Workflow matches, with lower rates for other evidence kinds. Exploratory analyses reveal a shift toward command-line and GitHub Agentic Workflow integrations, differences in declared safeguards, and frequent removal of detected agentic workflows. GHAgentCI supports longitudinal studies of coding-agent integration into CI.
作者备注：5 pages, 3 figures
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v1 · 2026-11-11 22:13 · 最新观测版本
GHAgentCI: A Dataset of Coding-Agent Invocations in CI Workflow Histories
Coding agents are increasingly integrated into GitHub Actions to review pull requests, triage issues and modify code. Identifying these integrations is challenging because agentic workflows often resemble ordinary CI files, with evidence appearing in action references, shell commands and workflow conventions. We present GHAgentCI, a dataset of 15K+ workflow histories from 6K+ of 196K+ mined GitHub repositories, comprising 159K+ revisions and 205K+ agent-evidence records linked to workflow triggers and declared execution constraints. Our open-source extractor, cai-miner, detects agent-related evidence using an extensible catalogue. Manual validation of 576 stratified records confirmed 96.1% of dedicated-action matches and 98.8% of GitHub Agentic Workflow matches, with lower rates for other evidence kinds. Exploratory analyses reveal a shift toward command-line and GitHub Agentic Workflow integrations, differences in declared safeguards, and frequent removal of detected agentic workflows. GHAgentCI supports longitudinal studies of coding-agent integration into CI.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗