跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.15849 · v1

Sharp Lower Bounds for Parallel Log-Concave Sampling

首次提交 2026-11-12 02:59
版本更新 2026-11-12 02:59
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

How many rounds of parallel queries are needed to sample from a smooth, strongly log-concave distribution on Rd\mathbb{R}^d? For every fixed condition number κ∈(1,∞)κ\in (1, \infty), we prove that any sampler making polynomially many queries per round requires Ωκ(log⁡d)Ω_κ(\log d) rounds to achieve constant total variation error in the worst case. The lower bound holds even if queries return derivatives of all orders. Together with the first-order parallel Picard algorithm of \cite{zhou2025parallel}, this establishes a depth complexity of Θκ(log⁡d)Θ_κ(\log d) for parallel log-concave sampling with poly⁡(d)\operatorname{poly}(d) width. We then study centered Gaussian targets to understand how much width is needed at a given depth. From \cite{chewi2023query,zhou2026complexitygaussiansampling}, it is known that either one round of width dd or O(κlog⁡d)\mathcal{O}(\sqrtκ \log d) rounds of constant width suffice for first-order Gaussian sampling. At fixed κκ we characterize the depth-width tradeoff interpolating between these regimes: when using ⌈clog⁡d⌉ \lceil c \log d\rceil rounds, if 0<c<c⋆(κ)0 < c < c_\star(κ) then the optimal width at constant TV error is Θ~(d1−c/c⋆(κ))\widetildeΘ(d^{1-c/c_\star(κ)}), while if c≥c⋆(κ)c \geq c_\star(κ) then it is Θκ(1)Θ_κ(1). Here, c⋆(κ)c_\star(κ) is an explicit constant with c⋆(κ)∼κ/8c_\star(κ) \sim \sqrtκ / 8 as κ→∞κ\to \infty.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-12 02:59 · 最新观测版本

Sharp Lower Bounds for Parallel Log-Concave Sampling

How many rounds of parallel queries are needed to sample from a smooth, strongly log-concave distribution on Rd\mathbb{R}^d? For every fixed condition number κ∈(1,∞)κ\in (1, \infty), we prove that any sampler making polynomially many queries per round requires Ωκ(log⁡d)Ω_κ(\log d) rounds to achieve constant total variation error in the worst case. The lower bound holds even if queries return derivatives of all orders. Together with the first-order parallel Picard algorithm of \cite{zhou2025parallel}, this establishes a depth complexity of Θκ(log⁡d)Θ_κ(\log d) for parallel log-concave sampling with poly⁡(d)\operatorname{poly}(d) width. We then study centered Gaussian targets to understand how much width is needed at a given depth. From \cite{chewi2023query,zhou2026complexitygaussiansampling}, it is known that either one round of width dd or O(κlog⁡d)\mathcal{O}(\sqrtκ \log d) rounds of constant width suffice for first-order Gaussian sampling. At fixed κκ we characterize the depth-width tradeoff interpolating between these regimes: when using ⌈clog⁡d⌉ \lceil c \log d\rceil rounds, if 0<c<c⋆(κ)0 < c < c_\star(κ) then the optimal width at constant TV error is Θ~(d1−c/c⋆(κ))\widetildeΘ(d^{1-c/c_\star(κ)}), while if c≥c⋆(κ)c \geq c_\star(κ) then it is Θκ(1)Θ_κ(1). Here, c⋆(κ)c_\star(κ) is an explicit constant with c⋆(κ)∼κ/8c_\star(κ) \sim \sqrtκ / 8 as κ→∞κ\to \infty.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗