跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.15925 · v1

ShadowBench: Exposing Lexical Anchoring and the Illusion of Forgetting in Large Language Models

首次提交 2026-11-12 03:19
版本更新 2026-11-12 03:19
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as primary interfaces for factual retrieval, yet current evaluation paradigms rely almost exclusively on explicit entity names. In this work, we demonstrate that LLM knowledge is fundamentally lexically anchored: models possess extensive factual information but find it significantly difficult to retrieve without explicit name tokens. To quantify this limitation, we introduce ShadowBench, a rigorously hardened, shortcut-resistant benchmark designed to evaluate Latent Entity Association via a novel Dual-Trait Association (DTA) task. Our evaluation reveals a pervasive "Shadow Gap" across all model scales$\unicode{x2013}$up to the frontier models GPT-5.4 and Claude-Sonnet-4.6$\unicode{x2013}$where removing lexical anchors causes performance drops of over 20%. Furthermore, we demonstrate that this lexical dependency exposes a critical vulnerability in AI safety. Applying ShadowBench to Machine Unlearning, we find that state-of-the-art algorithms (e.g., Gradient Difference, NPO) achieve only superficial lexical erasure. While unlearned models fail on direct queries, our novel Latent Entity Leakage Rate (LELR) metric reveals that for popular entities, models explicitly reconstruct the "forgotten" entity in their internal reasoning traces in over 74% of cases, utilizing residual shadow knowledge to solve associative tasks. Conversely, for niche entities, models retain high shadow accuracy (60-90%) via implicit attribute correlation despite 0% LELR. Ultimately, ShadowBench indicates that current unlearning paradigms create an "Illusion of Forgetting," demonstrating that existing methods act as superficial output filters and are not yet reliable for achieving true parametric erasure.

作者备注:Accepted at NeurIPS 2026 Evaluations and Datasets Track

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-12 03:19 · 最新观测版本

ShadowBench: Exposing Lexical Anchoring and the Illusion of Forgetting in Large Language Models

Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as primary interfaces for factual retrieval, yet current evaluation paradigms rely almost exclusively on explicit entity names. In this work, we demonstrate that LLM knowledge is fundamentally lexically anchored: models possess extensive factual information but find it significantly difficult to retrieve without explicit name tokens. To quantify this limitation, we introduce ShadowBench, a rigorously hardened, shortcut-resistant benchmark designed to evaluate Latent Entity Association via a novel Dual-Trait Association (DTA) task. Our evaluation reveals a pervasive "Shadow Gap" across all model scales$\unicode{x2013}$up to the frontier models GPT-5.4 and Claude-Sonnet-4.6$\unicode{x2013}$where removing lexical anchors causes performance drops of over 20%. Furthermore, we demonstrate that this lexical dependency exposes a critical vulnerability in AI safety. Applying ShadowBench to Machine Unlearning, we find that state-of-the-art algorithms (e.g., Gradient Difference, NPO) achieve only superficial lexical erasure. While unlearned models fail on direct queries, our novel Latent Entity Leakage Rate (LELR) metric reveals that for popular entities, models explicitly reconstruct the "forgotten" entity in their internal reasoning traces in over 74% of cases, utilizing residual shadow knowledge to solve associative tasks. Conversely, for niche entities, models retain high shadow accuracy (60-90%) via implicit attribute correlation despite 0% LELR. Ultimately, ShadowBench indicates that current unlearning paradigms create an "Illusion of Forgetting," demonstrating that existing methods act as superficial output filters and are not yet reliable for achieving true parametric erasure.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗