跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.15928 · v1

Runtime Safety and Emergency Stops on a Full-Size Humanoid: Deployment Lessons and a Case for Graduated Force Authority

首次提交 2026-11-12 03:23
版本更新 2026-11-12 03:23
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Full-size humanoid robots are being considered for hazardous industrial work such as disassembling electric-vehicle batteries. We describe the safety mechanisms of an open-source autonomy stack for the Unitree H1-2 humanoid and what deploying them taught us. All joint commands pass through a safety layer that runs separately from the control software. It enforces joint position, velocity, and torque limits, and it stops the robot when a state estimate becomes stale or when the hard-wired emergency stop (e-stop) is pressed or disconnected. We pushed the standing robot until it lost balance. With a model-predictive lower-body controller it never recovered, and the operator had to press the e-stop in every trial. Pressing it removes balance control, and the robot falls. The safety layer's own limits trigger the same stop, and limits chosen for manipulation were exceeded during normal walking. Near an operator or a battery pack, the fall can be more dangerous than the cause of the stop. Joint limits bound how much force a robot can apply, but not when applying it is appropriate. Drawing on research on responsibility and on child and adolescent development, we therefore make a case for granting robots force authority in stages, with a person or organization explicitly responsible for its use.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-12 03:23 · 最新观测版本

Runtime Safety and Emergency Stops on a Full-Size Humanoid: Deployment Lessons and a Case for Graduated Force Authority

Full-size humanoid robots are being considered for hazardous industrial work such as disassembling electric-vehicle batteries. We describe the safety mechanisms of an open-source autonomy stack for the Unitree H1-2 humanoid and what deploying them taught us. All joint commands pass through a safety layer that runs separately from the control software. It enforces joint position, velocity, and torque limits, and it stops the robot when a state estimate becomes stale or when the hard-wired emergency stop (e-stop) is pressed or disconnected. We pushed the standing robot until it lost balance. With a model-predictive lower-body controller it never recovered, and the operator had to press the e-stop in every trial. Pressing it removes balance control, and the robot falls. The safety layer's own limits trigger the same stop, and limits chosen for manipulation were exceeded during normal walking. Near an operator or a battery pack, the fall can be more dangerous than the cause of the stop. Joint limits bound how much force a robot can apply, but not when applying it is appropriate. Drawing on research on responsibility and on child and adolescent development, we therefore make a case for granting robots force authority in stages, with a person or organization explicitly responsible for its use.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗