跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.15968 · v1

DuoJEPA: Cross-Modal Translation Between Unaligned Self-Supervised Embedding Spaces

首次提交 2026-11-12 04:10
版本更新 2026-11-12 04:10
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Learning from paired modalities is commonly equated with aligning them: two encoders are trained until the embeddings of a pair coincide in a shared space. We study whether cross-modal retrieval and classification can instead be obtained while the two encoders' own embedding spaces remain directly unaligned. DuoJEPA trains one encoder per modality with the self-supervised LeJEPA objective and appends to each encoder a single transformer layer that translates its embedding into the other encoder's space, supervised by a contrastive objective computed entirely within that target space. No loss term compares the two own spaces directly, although the encoders are optimised jointly through the translation objective. In our experiments, the translator's residual connections determine where the cross-modal pressure is absorbed: with a residual translator the two encoders become directly aligned, whereas with a skipless (residual-free) translator a paired-cosine test detects no alignment in the final models, and at most a weak one in the ablations, at comparable cross-modal performance. The learned class-token translation is well approximated by a single scaled rotation of the source space. We evaluate DuoJEPA on two modality pairs that differ in nearly every respect. On chest radiographs and reports from CheXpert Plus, it attains a zero-shot AUC of 86.6 and a cross-modal retrieval score of 78.5, compared with 60.0 and 64.2 for our reimplementation of LeVLJEPA with the same encoders and data. On Sentinel-2 optical and Sentinel-1 radar imagery, the frozen encoders fall within the range of published Sentinel foundation models under our reproduction of the Copernicus-Bench linear-probe protocol, the translator retrieves the paired image of the other sensor among 4,000 candidates in 77-79% of cases, and a patch-level extension transfers the within-image similarity structure of the scene.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-12 04:10 · 最新观测版本

DuoJEPA: Cross-Modal Translation Between Unaligned Self-Supervised Embedding Spaces

Learning from paired modalities is commonly equated with aligning them: two encoders are trained until the embeddings of a pair coincide in a shared space. We study whether cross-modal retrieval and classification can instead be obtained while the two encoders' own embedding spaces remain directly unaligned. DuoJEPA trains one encoder per modality with the self-supervised LeJEPA objective and appends to each encoder a single transformer layer that translates its embedding into the other encoder's space, supervised by a contrastive objective computed entirely within that target space. No loss term compares the two own spaces directly, although the encoders are optimised jointly through the translation objective. In our experiments, the translator's residual connections determine where the cross-modal pressure is absorbed: with a residual translator the two encoders become directly aligned, whereas with a skipless (residual-free) translator a paired-cosine test detects no alignment in the final models, and at most a weak one in the ablations, at comparable cross-modal performance. The learned class-token translation is well approximated by a single scaled rotation of the source space. We evaluate DuoJEPA on two modality pairs that differ in nearly every respect. On chest radiographs and reports from CheXpert Plus, it attains a zero-shot AUC of 86.6 and a cross-modal retrieval score of 78.5, compared with 60.0 and 64.2 for our reimplementation of LeVLJEPA with the same encoders and data. On Sentinel-2 optical and Sentinel-1 radar imagery, the frozen encoders fall within the range of published Sentinel foundation models under our reproduction of the Copernicus-Bench linear-probe protocol, the translator retrieves the paired image of the other sensor among 4,000 candidates in 77-79% of cases, and a patch-level extension transfers the within-image similarity structure of the scene.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗