跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.16244 · v1

SEC: One-Share Everywhere-Short Secret Sharing from Lossless Expanders

首次提交 2026-11-12 11:41
版本更新 2026-11-12 11:41
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

We introduce SEC, an expander-code-based ramp secret sharing scheme over Z\mathbb{Z}-modules, particularly suitable for lattice-based distributed cryptography. It is everywhere-short: bounded secret coefficients yield bounded share coefficients, and the integer reconstruction vectors have bounded entries. Moreover, each participant receives exactly one share, regardless of the number of parties and the privacy and reconstruction thresholds. This improves on prior schemes with bounded share coefficients and bounded entries in the integer reconstruction vectors, in which the number of sub-shares or shares per participant grows either with the number of parties and the threshold or with the security parameter. The construction rests on a coding-theoretic observation: in the bi-adjacency matrix of a lossless bipartite expander, unique-neighbor peeling completes every sufficiently small set of columns to a square unimodular submatrix. We prove correctness, everywhere-shortness, and linearity, and give a publicly computable entrywise bound on the reconstruction vector our algorithm returns for each authorized set. For privacy, we introduce hard-core local leakage resilience, which strengthens the leakage-resilience notion of Nielsen and Simkin (EUROCRYPT 2020) to protect a hard-core function of the secret, and we prove that SEC satisfies it against correlated multi-query local leakage under the MatrixHint-MLWE problem, which admits a reduction from the standard MLWE problem. For n=60n=60 participants and security parameter κ=128κ=128, SEC achieves privacy threshold 6 against 2642^{64} leakage queries and empirical reconstruction threshold 46. The ideal entropy-coded secret and share sizes are about 3.5 KiB and 6.4 KiB, respectively.

作者备注:84 pages, 3 figures. Also available as Cryptology ePrint Archive, Paper 2026/2841: https://eprint.iacr.org/2026/2841

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-12 11:41 · 最新观测版本

SEC: One-Share Everywhere-Short Secret Sharing from Lossless Expanders

We introduce SEC, an expander-code-based ramp secret sharing scheme over Z\mathbb{Z}-modules, particularly suitable for lattice-based distributed cryptography. It is everywhere-short: bounded secret coefficients yield bounded share coefficients, and the integer reconstruction vectors have bounded entries. Moreover, each participant receives exactly one share, regardless of the number of parties and the privacy and reconstruction thresholds. This improves on prior schemes with bounded share coefficients and bounded entries in the integer reconstruction vectors, in which the number of sub-shares or shares per participant grows either with the number of parties and the threshold or with the security parameter. The construction rests on a coding-theoretic observation: in the bi-adjacency matrix of a lossless bipartite expander, unique-neighbor peeling completes every sufficiently small set of columns to a square unimodular submatrix. We prove correctness, everywhere-shortness, and linearity, and give a publicly computable entrywise bound on the reconstruction vector our algorithm returns for each authorized set. For privacy, we introduce hard-core local leakage resilience, which strengthens the leakage-resilience notion of Nielsen and Simkin (EUROCRYPT 2020) to protect a hard-core function of the secret, and we prove that SEC satisfies it against correlated multi-query local leakage under the MatrixHint-MLWE problem, which admits a reduction from the standard MLWE problem. For n=60n=60 participants and security parameter κ=128κ=128, SEC achieves privacy threshold 6 against 2642^{64} leakage queries and empirical reconstruction threshold 46. The ideal entropy-coded secret and share sizes are about 3.5 KiB and 6.4 KiB, respectively.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗