跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.16630 · v1

When Chekhov's Gun Fires Anyway: Over-Realization in Text-to-Image Models

首次提交 2026-11-12 19:03
版本更新 2026-11-12 19:03
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:15
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

In text-to-image generation, a target that the prompt mentions often appears in the generated image in a way the prompt does not call for. We call this failure over-realization. Mental-spaces theory points to the situations where it can happen: under a negation, inside what a character believes or imagines, as the vehicle of a figurative comparison, or behind a viewpoint that hides the target. Prior work has studied only negation in depth, and the conventional alignment and preference metrics do not penalize the failure. We build OverReal to measure it: OverReal-Gen, 698 prompts covering the four situations, on which we measure each generator's over-realization rate; and OverReal-Det, 2,841 generated images human-labeled for whether and how the target is over-realized, on which we verify the automatic judge that produces this rate. Our evaluation of eight text-to-image systems reveals that all of them over-realize, and that conventional metrics such as CLIPScore reward the failure rather than penalize it. Prompt expansion only partly mitigates the failure. Inside the generator, the diffusion backbone attends to a mentioned target almost as much as to a requested one. The cue words that should hold the target back receive less attention than ordinary words.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-12 19:03 · 最新观测版本

When Chekhov's Gun Fires Anyway: Over-Realization in Text-to-Image Models

In text-to-image generation, a target that the prompt mentions often appears in the generated image in a way the prompt does not call for. We call this failure over-realization. Mental-spaces theory points to the situations where it can happen: under a negation, inside what a character believes or imagines, as the vehicle of a figurative comparison, or behind a viewpoint that hides the target. Prior work has studied only negation in depth, and the conventional alignment and preference metrics do not penalize the failure. We build OverReal to measure it: OverReal-Gen, 698 prompts covering the four situations, on which we measure each generator's over-realization rate; and OverReal-Det, 2,841 generated images human-labeled for whether and how the target is over-realized, on which we verify the automatic judge that produces this rate. Our evaluation of eight text-to-image systems reveals that all of them over-realize, and that conventional metrics such as CLIPScore reward the failure rather than penalize it. Prompt expansion only partly mitigates the failure. Inside the generator, the diffusion backbone attends to a mentioned target almost as much as to a requested one. The cue words that should hold the target back receive less attention than ordinary words.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗