← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2611.16792 · v1
Systematic Evaluation of Training Data Generation Strategies for Machine Learning-Based Molecular and Materials Property Prediction
首次提交 2026-11-12 21:38
版本更新 2026-11-12 21:38
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:15
摘要
Machine-learning (ML) models for molecular and materials property prediction are often trained on large datasets curated through arbitrary or generic sampling strategies. Such approaches can lead to the over- or under-representation of regions of chemical and materials space that are most relevant to the prediction task. An important challenge is therefore how to efficiently curate training data to maximize predictive performance while minimising the number of labelled examples required. Here, we systematically compare training data acquisition strategies for molecular and materials property prediction, ranging from random sampling to various active learning approaches. We evaluate their performance across different model classes, representations, datasets, and target properties. Our results show that the effectiveness of data acquisition strategies depend strongly on the interplay between the model, dataset, and prediction task, although uncertainty-based sampling generally outperforms alternative strategies. Based on these findings, we derive guidelines for selecting data acquisition strategies under a given labelling budget.
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v1 · 2026-11-12 21:38 · 最新观测版本
Systematic Evaluation of Training Data Generation Strategies for Machine Learning-Based Molecular and Materials Property Prediction
Machine-learning (ML) models for molecular and materials property prediction are often trained on large datasets curated through arbitrary or generic sampling strategies. Such approaches can lead to the over- or under-representation of regions of chemical and materials space that are most relevant to the prediction task. An important challenge is therefore how to efficiently curate training data to maximize predictive performance while minimising the number of labelled examples required. Here, we systematically compare training data acquisition strategies for molecular and materials property prediction, ranging from random sampling to various active learning approaches. We evaluate their performance across different model classes, representations, datasets, and target properties. Our results show that the effectiveness of data acquisition strategies depend strongly on the interplay between the model, dataset, and prediction task, although uncertainty-based sampling generally outperforms alternative strategies. Based on these findings, we derive guidelines for selecting data acquisition strategies under a given labelling budget.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗