跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.16792 · v1

Systematic Evaluation of Training Data Generation Strategies for Machine Learning-Based Molecular and Materials Property Prediction

首次提交 2026-11-12 21:38
版本更新 2026-11-12 21:38
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:15
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Machine-learning (ML) models for molecular and materials property prediction are often trained on large datasets curated through arbitrary or generic sampling strategies. Such approaches can lead to the over- or under-representation of regions of chemical and materials space that are most relevant to the prediction task. An important challenge is therefore how to efficiently curate training data to maximize predictive performance while minimising the number of labelled examples required. Here, we systematically compare training data acquisition strategies for molecular and materials property prediction, ranging from random sampling to various active learning approaches. We evaluate their performance across different model classes, representations, datasets, and target properties. Our results show that the effectiveness of data acquisition strategies depend strongly on the interplay between the model, dataset, and prediction task, although uncertainty-based sampling generally outperforms alternative strategies. Based on these findings, we derive guidelines for selecting data acquisition strategies under a given labelling budget.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-12 21:38 · 最新观测版本

Systematic Evaluation of Training Data Generation Strategies for Machine Learning-Based Molecular and Materials Property Prediction

Machine-learning (ML) models for molecular and materials property prediction are often trained on large datasets curated through arbitrary or generic sampling strategies. Such approaches can lead to the over- or under-representation of regions of chemical and materials space that are most relevant to the prediction task. An important challenge is therefore how to efficiently curate training data to maximize predictive performance while minimising the number of labelled examples required. Here, we systematically compare training data acquisition strategies for molecular and materials property prediction, ranging from random sampling to various active learning approaches. We evaluate their performance across different model classes, representations, datasets, and target properties. Our results show that the effectiveness of data acquisition strategies depend strongly on the interplay between the model, dataset, and prediction task, although uncertainty-based sampling generally outperforms alternative strategies. Based on these findings, we derive guidelines for selecting data acquisition strategies under a given labelling budget.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗