跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.16947 · v1

SignalAudit-QD: A Reproducible Audit Resource for External Signals in AI-Query Forecasting

首次提交 2026-11-12 23:25
版本更新 2026-11-12 23:25
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:15
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

SignalAudit-QD is a reproducible audit resource for testing whether a dated public signal adds information beyond query history in a fixed 20-term U.S. AI panel. It aligns two archived Google Trends extractions with eight USPTO AI-patent publication streams and releases origin-indexed predictions, paired losses, provenance, executable tests, and tamper-evident run manifests. Both inputs are retrospective reconstructions obtained after the modeled 2020--2023 origins; the task is therefore a pseudo-origin assay within frozen measurement vintages, not a historical deployment simulation. In the designated one-month comparison, adding a two-component patent block to a level ridge changes macro mean absolute error by +0.0012 Trends points, with conditional 95% moving-block interval [-0.0363,+0.0387]. This establishes neither aggregate benefit nor equivalence. Alternative dimensions, semantic mapping, patent definitions, a second extraction, and a three-month horizon remain unresolved; persistence-anchored and nonlinear hosts instead show model-specific worsening, tiny for the anchored fit. Matched timing controls expose availability assumptions, while a planted-signal assay detects only the largest tested injection. A within-query high-interest alert demonstrates the released interface but not online utility. The contribution is a bounded negative case study and an extensible evidence schema for auditing external-signal claims in temporal information retrieval.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-12 23:25 · 最新观测版本

SignalAudit-QD: A Reproducible Audit Resource for External Signals in AI-Query Forecasting

SignalAudit-QD is a reproducible audit resource for testing whether a dated public signal adds information beyond query history in a fixed 20-term U.S. AI panel. It aligns two archived Google Trends extractions with eight USPTO AI-patent publication streams and releases origin-indexed predictions, paired losses, provenance, executable tests, and tamper-evident run manifests. Both inputs are retrospective reconstructions obtained after the modeled 2020--2023 origins; the task is therefore a pseudo-origin assay within frozen measurement vintages, not a historical deployment simulation. In the designated one-month comparison, adding a two-component patent block to a level ridge changes macro mean absolute error by +0.0012 Trends points, with conditional 95% moving-block interval [-0.0363,+0.0387]. This establishes neither aggregate benefit nor equivalence. Alternative dimensions, semantic mapping, patent definitions, a second extraction, and a three-month horizon remain unresolved; persistence-anchored and nonlinear hosts instead show model-specific worsening, tiny for the anchored fit. Matched timing controls expose availability assumptions, while a planted-signal assay detects only the largest tested injection. A within-query high-interest alert demonstrates the released interface but not online utility. The contribution is a bounded negative case study and an extensible evidence schema for auditing external-signal claims in temporal information retrieval.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗