跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.17058 · v1

Neural Representations as New Modes of Interactivity

神经表征作为新的交互模式

首次提交 2026-11-13 00:36
版本更新 2026-11-13 00:36
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:15
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Human-AI interaction today runs almost entirely through prompts and outputs, keeping AI systems opaque to general users. We introduce Neural Representation Interaction (NRI), a paradigm that treats the internal representations of neural networks as an interaction material people can inspect, steer, and edit. Situating NRI alongside graphical, tangible, and bio-computer interaction, we argue that the concepts and algorithms models encode internally offer representational affordances for richer human-AI interaction. We synthesize actionable mechanistic interpretability methods and, drawing on General Morphological Analysis, construct a design space spanning Interaction, Target, Referent, and Purpose. Mapping existing interfaces onto this space reveals that most serve expert auditors, while few support lay users. We then present speculative applications in education, personal user modeling, and hiring audits, and discuss design principles, limitations, and sociotechnical risks. NRI offers HCI researchers abstractions for designing interactions that work with AI computation rather than only through its inputs and outputs.

作者备注:12 pages, 2 figures, 2 tables

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

提出“神经表征交互”(NRI)范式,将神经网络内部表征视为用户可检视、引导和编辑的交互材料,并构建相应设计空间。

正在读取账号与研究记录…

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-13 00:36 · 最新观测版本

Neural Representations as New Modes of Interactivity

Human-AI interaction today runs almost entirely through prompts and outputs, keeping AI systems opaque to general users. We introduce Neural Representation Interaction (NRI), a paradigm that treats the internal representations of neural networks as an interaction material people can inspect, steer, and edit. Situating NRI alongside graphical, tangible, and bio-computer interaction, we argue that the concepts and algorithms models encode internally offer representational affordances for richer human-AI interaction. We synthesize actionable mechanistic interpretability methods and, drawing on General Morphological Analysis, construct a design space spanning Interaction, Target, Referent, and Purpose. Mapping existing interfaces onto this space reveals that most serve expert auditors, while few support lay users. We then present speculative applications in education, personal user modeling, and hiring audits, and discuss design principles, limitations, and sociotechnical risks. NRI offers HCI researchers abstractions for designing interactions that work with AI computation rather than only through its inputs and outputs.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗