← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2611.17292 · v1
The Submodular Secretary Problem: Tight $1-1/e$ for Monotone Objectives, and Strictly Between $1/e$ and $1/2$ in General
首次提交 2026-11-13 02:53
版本更新 2026-11-13 02:53
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:15
摘要
In the submodular secretary problem with a cardinality constraint, $n$ elements arrive in uniformly random order, and an algorithm must irrevocably accept or reject each one on arrival so as to maximize a nonnegative submodular function over sets of at most $k$ elements. For monotone objectives we settle the problem: the optimal competitive ratio tends to exactly $1-1/e$ as $k\to\infty$, and its worst case over all budgets $k$ is exactly $1/e$. The bound $1-1/e$ cannot be exceeded even with unlimited computation, and it is achieved by a single algorithm with at most $4n+1$ value queries; previously the best ratio without a shortlist was $1/e-o(1)$, with exponentially many queries. For general objectives, where the best known ratio was about $0.107$, we show that the optimal limiting ratio lies strictly between $1/e$ and $1/2$: we achieve $1/e+3.5\cdot10^{-6}$ for large $k$, and no algorithm achieves more than $0.497053$. We also achieve $0.2677$ at every budget. The main new ingredient of our algorithm is eligibility attenuation: an element that passes the price test at time $t$ is accepted with probability $e^{-τ}$, where $τ$ is the total earlier time during which it would have passed, which makes the probability that it has already been selected exactly $1-e^{-τ}$.
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v1 · 2026-11-13 02:53 · 最新观测版本
The Submodular Secretary Problem: Tight $1-1/e$ for Monotone Objectives, and Strictly Between $1/e$ and $1/2$ in General
In the submodular secretary problem with a cardinality constraint, $n$ elements arrive in uniformly random order, and an algorithm must irrevocably accept or reject each one on arrival so as to maximize a nonnegative submodular function over sets of at most $k$ elements. For monotone objectives we settle the problem: the optimal competitive ratio tends to exactly $1-1/e$ as $k\to\infty$, and its worst case over all budgets $k$ is exactly $1/e$. The bound $1-1/e$ cannot be exceeded even with unlimited computation, and it is achieved by a single algorithm with at most $4n+1$ value queries; previously the best ratio without a shortlist was $1/e-o(1)$, with exponentially many queries. For general objectives, where the best known ratio was about $0.107$, we show that the optimal limiting ratio lies strictly between $1/e$ and $1/2$: we achieve $1/e+3.5\cdot10^{-6}$ for large $k$, and no algorithm achieves more than $0.497053$. We also achieve $0.2677$ at every budget. The main new ingredient of our algorithm is eligibility attenuation: an element that passes the price test at time $t$ is accepted with probability $e^{-τ}$, where $τ$ is the total earlier time during which it would have passed, which makes the probability that it has already been selected exactly $1-e^{-τ}$.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗