← 研踪 PaperTrailACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.1907 · 记录 #1
The Visual Iconicity Challenge: Evaluating Vision-Language Models on Sign Language Form–Meaning Mapping
来源日期（仅到月份） 2026-07
来源记录日期 2026-07
雷达观测 2026-11-01 21:48
摘要
Iconicity, the resemblance between linguistic form and meaning, is pervasive in sign languages, offering a natural testbed for visual grounding in vision–language models (VLMs). We introduce the Visual Iconicity Challenge, a video-based benchmark that adapts psycholinguistic measures to evaluate VLMs on three tasks: (i) phonological sign-form prediction, (ii) transparency (inferring meaning from visual form), and (iii) graded iconicity ratings. We assess 17 state-of-the-art VLMs in zero- and few-shot settings on Sign Language of the Netherlands and compare them to human baselines. VLMs mirror human phonological difficulty patterns (e.g., handshape harder than location) and achieve moderate to strong alignment with human iconicity ratings. However, they still fail to infer lexical meaning from visual form alone and show a systematic object-based bias that inverts the human preference for action-based signs. Crucially, models with stronger phonological form prediction correlate better with human iconicity judgments, indicating shared sensitivity to visually grounded structure. Our findings validate these diagnostic tasks, show that explicit reasoning narrows the open-to-closed-model calibration gap, and motivate human-centric signals for modelling iconicity in multimodal models.
论文发现出处
这些页面提供论文线索，不代表同行评审或质量认证。
观测到的版本
平台记录号代表本站观测到的元数据变化，不是作者修订号。来源日期仅到月份或年份时，按该月或该年首日存档。
记录 #1 · 2026-07 · 最新观测版本
The Visual Iconicity Challenge: Evaluating Vision-Language Models on Sign Language Form–Meaning Mapping
Iconicity, the resemblance between linguistic form and meaning, is pervasive in sign languages, offering a natural testbed for visual grounding in vision–language models (VLMs). We introduce the Visual Iconicity Challenge, a video-based benchmark that adapts psycholinguistic measures to evaluate VLMs on three tasks: (i) phonological sign-form prediction, (ii) transparency (inferring meaning from visual form), and (iii) graded iconicity ratings. We assess 17 state-of-the-art VLMs in zero- and few-shot settings on Sign Language of the Netherlands and compare them to human baselines. VLMs mirror human phonological difficulty patterns (e.g., handshape harder than location) and achieve moderate to strong alignment with human iconicity ratings. However, they still fail to infer lexical meaning from visual form alone and show a systematic object-based bias that inverts the human preference for action-based signs. Crucially, models with stronger phonological form prediction correlate better with human iconicity judgments, indicating shared sensitivity to visually grounded structure. Our findings validate these diagnostic tasks, show that explicit reasoning narrows the open-to-closed-model calibration gap, and motivate human-centric signals for modelling iconicity in multimodal models.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗