跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

CVF · CVPR 2026:cvf:c7b7f0ebc2c9b1caaf518fbda1b1ec1c · 记录 #1

UI-Lens: Assessing General MLLMs' Potential to Automate UI Display Quality Assurance

来源日期(仅到年份) 2026
来源记录日期 2026
雷达观测 2026-11-05 00:31
CVF · CVPR 2026 ↗PDF ↗

摘要

User Interface (UI) display defect detection poses challenges far beyond UI understanding, requiring fine-grained element boundary understanding, missing-content detection, and reasoning about sequential interface semantic consistency. However, the capabilities of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs) for detecting UI defects in realistic, complex interfaces have not been systematically validated. To fill this gap, we present UI-Lens, the first multi-dimensional UI display detection benchmark for Chinese-language UI scenarios. The dataset comprises 4,759 pages meticulously annotated by design experts, covering six core display defect categories. We conduct a systematic evaluation of 10 mainstream models (8 closed-source, 2 open-source). Results show clear shortcomings in current models: for tasks requiring fine-grained element boundary understanding, performance is near random, with task-average F1 scores of 20.36% and 31.21% on Text Overflow and Container Overlap, respectively; for sequential interface semantic consistency (e.g., Text Inconsistency), the task-average F1 score is only 10.61%, indicating severe underperformance. We release UI-Lens to catalyze research toward more robust UI display defect detection with fine-grained boundary awareness in realistic, complex interfaces.

论文发现出处

这些页面提供论文线索,不代表同行评审或质量认证。

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

发表信息与关联版本

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

平台记录号代表本站观测到的元数据变化,不是作者修订号。来源日期仅到月份或年份时,按该月或该年首日存档。

记录 #1 · 2026 · 最新观测版本

UI-Lens: Assessing General MLLMs' Potential to Automate UI Display Quality Assurance

User Interface (UI) display defect detection poses challenges far beyond UI understanding, requiring fine-grained element boundary understanding, missing-content detection, and reasoning about sequential interface semantic consistency. However, the capabilities of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs) for detecting UI defects in realistic, complex interfaces have not been systematically validated. To fill this gap, we present UI-Lens, the first multi-dimensional UI display detection benchmark for Chinese-language UI scenarios. The dataset comprises 4,759 pages meticulously annotated by design experts, covering six core display defect categories. We conduct a systematic evaluation of 10 mainstream models (8 closed-source, 2 open-source). Results show clear shortcomings in current models: for tasks requiring fine-grained element boundary understanding, performance is near random, with task-average F1 scores of 20.36% and 31.21% on Text Overflow and Container Overlap, respectively; for sequential interface semantic consistency (e.g., Text Inconsistency), the task-average F1 score is only 10.61%, indicating severe underperformance. We release UI-Lens to catalyze research toward more robust UI display defect detection with fine-grained boundary awareness in realistic, complex interfaces.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗