跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

CVF · CVPR 2026:cvf:c8ec76c1b4d224f15dd4e01764fdde2b · 记录 #1

Synthesizing Visual Concepts as Vision-Language Programs

来源日期(仅到年份) 2026
来源记录日期 2026
雷达观测 2026-11-05 01:33
CVF · CVPR 2026 ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Vision-Language models (VLMs) achieve strong performance on multimodal tasks but often fail at systematic visual reasoning, especially in inductive reasoning problems. Neuro-symbolic methods promise to address this by inducing interpretable logical programs from images, though they usually rely on rigid, domain-specific perception modules for this. We propose Vision-Language Programs (VLP), which combine the perceptual flexibility of VLMs with the systematic reasoning of symbolic program synthesis. Rather than embedding reasoning inside the VLM, VLP leverages the model to produce structured visual descriptions that are compiled into neuro-symbolic programs. The resulting programs execute directly on images, remain consistent with task constraints, and provide human-interpretable explanations that enable easy shortcut mitigation. Our experiments across synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate that VLPs outperform both direct and structured prompting of VLMs, particularly on tasks that require complex logical reasoning.

论文发现出处

这些页面提供论文线索,不代表同行评审或质量认证。

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

发表信息与关联版本

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

平台记录号代表本站观测到的元数据变化,不是作者修订号。来源日期仅到月份或年份时,按该月或该年首日存档。

记录 #1 · 2026 · 最新观测版本

Synthesizing Visual Concepts as Vision-Language Programs

Vision-Language models (VLMs) achieve strong performance on multimodal tasks but often fail at systematic visual reasoning, especially in inductive reasoning problems. Neuro-symbolic methods promise to address this by inducing interpretable logical programs from images, though they usually rely on rigid, domain-specific perception modules for this. We propose Vision-Language Programs (VLP), which combine the perceptual flexibility of VLMs with the systematic reasoning of symbolic program synthesis. Rather than embedding reasoning inside the VLM, VLP leverages the model to produce structured visual descriptions that are compiled into neuro-symbolic programs. The resulting programs execute directly on images, remain consistent with task constraints, and provide human-interpretable explanations that enable easy shortcut mitigation. Our experiments across synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate that VLPs outperform both direct and structured prompting of VLMs, particularly on tasks that require complex logical reasoning.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗