跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+3新增论文
+3其中 AI 相关
+1已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-12 17:17 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-12 06:37各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-11 18:17 — 2026-11-12 18:17(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-12 17:17最近发现新增版本:2026-11-12 06:37库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,675 已收录论文18,323 AI 相关6,056 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-12 17:15(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.12665

Trade Promotion Optimisation for Consumer Goods

Ankur Verma, Namrata Gupta

原文摘要

Trade promotions consume a large share of consumer-goods revenue, yet most planners still set discounts with a single, often unreliable, price elasticity per item. We present an end-to-end Trade Promotion Optimisation (TPO) system built as one chain: analogue SKUs, point elasticity, elasticity curve, price recommendation, promotional lift and net lift. Elasticity is measured at post-promo time from directional price-dip events against a rolling regular price, and at promo time by a causal estimator that residualises trend, seasonality and promotion, handles stock-out censoring with a Tobit likelihood and updates itself from the first clean promotion week. Items with weak evidence borrow the point elasticity and the curvature from analogue SKUs chosen by a cross-validated ridge model over category, brand, sub-category, price line and description. The optimiser separates self-price lift from substitution and post-promo dips and adjusts for inventory and trade funding. In a four-week promotion experiment on a 39-SKU consumer brand (mean elasticity -3.06), the plan lifts units by 20.6% and revenue by 6.9% at flat margin. Analogue pooling halves elasticity error relative to hierarchy averaging.

cs.LG

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.12116

Forecast Value Add: Reward-Based Action Selection over Probabilistic Demand Forecasts

Ankur Verma

原文摘要

Strong machine-learning ensembles capture much of the trend, seasonality, and known events in demand, yet they can still understate peaks, miss moving events, or mistake temporary changes for shifts in demand level. We address this gap by framing forecast refinement as a reward-driven decision problem. For each forecast period, we let an agent choose among values already produced by the ensemble: its base forecast, distribution-free bounds, quantiles, and a bias-corrected estimate. We evaluate these choices against context-matched historical periods, accounting for calendar position, recurring and moving events, trend, price, and promotions. We then apply a structural seasonal guard to constrain adjustments and record the model, agent, and planner contributions to every published value. We evaluate our approach across five retail, consumer-goods, and direct-to-consumer deployments over nine months. Our refined forecasts reduce mean WMAPE by 6.3% compared with the stacked machine-learning forecast for every customer, with gains reaching 16.7%, and achieve the lowest error in 35 of 45 customer-months. Compared with statistical forecasts, our approach reduces mean error by 18.7%. These results demonstrate that context-aware, auditable action selection can add forecast value beyond a strong ensemble.

cs.LG