跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+1已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-08 22:53 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-08 06:02各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-07 23:24 — 2026-11-08 23:24(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-08 22:53最近发现新增版本:2026-11-08 06:02库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,057 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-08 22:48(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.06184

Can Astra Solve RoboMME without Breaking the Bank?

Bingao Chen, Haoquan Fang, C. Karen Liu

原文摘要

Robotic manipulation often requires remembering information that is no longer visible, such as an object's location before occlusion or the order of a demonstrated action sequence. A large vision-language planner can read this history, but calling it before every action chunk is slow and costly. We present a three-tier system for the RoboMME benchmark. GPT-6 Astra (System 2) selects a grounded subtask from stored visual history, a $π_{0.5}$ vision-language-action policy (System 1) executes it, and a fine-tuned Qwen3-VL-4B monitor (System 1.5) checks after each action chunk whether the subtask is finished. The instruction is kept until the monitor reports completion or a task-specific event occurs, while the policy keeps acting on new observations. On RoboMME, the system succeeds in 79.13% of episodes with an average of 3.63 Astra calls and 80.84 seconds per episode. This is 34.62 points above the best published non-oracle baseline and 4.95 points below GroundSG+Oracle, which gives the low-level policy ground-truth subgoals.

cs.RO