跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

采集已暂停
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+0新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:等待完成 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-02 00:39各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-03 13:32 — 2026-11-04 13:32(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:尚未完成最近发现新增版本:2026-11-02 00:39库内论文最新更新时间:2026-10-30 01:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

8,677 已收录论文7,675 AI 相关1,866 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序等待首次采集
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.39109

PCM: A Proof-Carrying Message Protocol for Verifiable Multi-Agent Communication

Bravish Ghosh

When one AI agent tells another that "the tests passed" or "a person approved this refund", the receiver has only the sender's word. A2A and MCP authenticate the channel, but the sender is the party in doubt, so a prompt-injected agent can launder fabricated facts and authority through a multi-agent system. We present Proof-Carrying Messages (PCM), a protocol in which each claim carries evidence: records from an append-only Merkle log that the agent cannot write, with inclusion proofs, signed by an attesting signer the agent cannot control. Receivers check messages offline and give each claim a three-valued result: proven, unproven or failed. A claim that rests only on the agent's own report is never proven. Authority travels as grant chains rooted in a recorded human approval, and the chains can only narrow. We specify four claim types, a typed caveat algebra, replay rules that survive restarts, and strict readings that make independent verifiers agree, and we prove the resulting security properties. On a pre-specified benchmark of 926 messages from real runs, 712 of them lies in 16 classes, PCM accepts 10 lies, all of them stale evidence (1.4%, 95% CI 0.8-2.6%). Plain A2A accepts all 712, and models of six deployed protocols (A2A with signed Agent Cards, uAgents, RFC 9421, SCITT, AP2, Verifiable Intent) accept 504-712. Two independent verifiers agree on all 926 verdicts, and verification takes about 1 ms.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CE · cs.AI · cs.CR · cs.MA
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.38458

Tracekit Box: Running AI Agents in Micro-VMs Where Every Way Out Is Decided and Signed

Bravish Ghosh

AI agents now install packages, call model APIs with their operators' keys and change code in repositories that deploy to production. The network, credentials and write access they need are also how they can leak data, steal a key or change a system nobody approved. Sandboxes contain an agent but leave little evidence of what crossed their boundary; tracing records what happened but contains nothing. We present Tracekit Box, an open-source system (MIT, v0) that does both. Each job runs in its own Firecracker micro-VM with no network card. The only ways out are doors on the host, served over vsock: commands, outbound connections, secrets, model calls and the workspace patch. At every door a Tracekit signer the agent cannot reach decides what passes and signs it into one run per box. Names are resolved on the host; private and cloud-metadata addresses are always refused; secrets never enter the VM, which sees placeholders the host proxy swaps for real values only in one header for bound hosts; and changes come back as a patch applied file by file after the signer decides each file. Box fails closed, and each job ends as a .tkb bundle anyone can verify offline. All 13 end-to-end checks pass on a real KVM runner (the test that runs them takes 28.5 s, including image pull and boot); 15 fuzz targets on the trust boundary produced nine findings, all fixed; and the demo run's 102 signed records verify. Box does not yet run Firecracker's jailer, needs a co-located signer, and records processes inside the VM only where they cross a door.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CE · cs.AI · cs.CR · cs.OS
arXiv ↗PDF ↗