跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+2471新增论文
+2025其中 AI 相关
+163已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-10 20:36 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-10 15:22各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-09 21:43 — 2026-11-10 21:43(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-10 20:36最近发现新增版本:2026-11-10 15:22库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-10 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

20,643 已收录论文17,531 AI 相关5,643 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-10 20:33(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.10056

Safety Direction Adapter: A Training-Free Post-Hoc Safety Patch for Fine-Tuned Open-Weight LLMs

Chansu Han, Takeshi Takahashi

原文摘要

Open-weight LLMs are routinely fine-tuned from public repositories, yet task-specific adaptation can silently erode safety alignment inherited from instruct-tuned bases. This is a supply-chain risk when organizations ship third-party checkpoints without full re-alignment. Prior work rarely audits diverse public fine-tunes under a shared multi-axis safety-utility protocol or offers training-free mitigation at deployment time. We propose Safety Direction Adapter (SDA), a training-free post-hoc safety patch that extracts a safety direction once from an aligned base and transfers it one-to-many within that base family as a small PEFT-compatible weight update, evaluated under the same multi-axis protocol. Across six direction extractors, we evaluate 14 checkpoints from two 1-2B lineages and probe 8B and 27B fleets (n=5 each) on 15 benchmarks (12538 prompts). On Llama, SDA improves the four-axis mean by about 2.3 points against a 4.2-point instruct-relative gap (about 55 percent recovery; partial Avg), with Safety and Cyber recovering toward or beyond instruct; Safety gains about 8.5 points against about 4.9 points mean degradation. On Qwen, degradation is larger and excess-driven; SDA still lifts Avg (about 36 percent of the gap) while trading Safety and Cyber against Excess and General. We report dual-use risks of publishing direction adapters and do not claim robustness to adaptive or white-box attacks.

cs.CR