跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+1已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-09 03:03 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-08 06:02各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-08 03:16 — 2026-11-09 03:16(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-09 03:03最近发现新增版本:2026-11-08 06:02库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,057 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-09 03:01(北京时间)
版本更新 · v3arXiv:2608.12231

An Efficient Minimax-Optimal Algorithm for Adversarial $m$-Set Bandits

Francesco Bacchiocchi, Tommaso Cesari, Roberto Colomboni

原文摘要

We study adversarial combinatorial bandits with $m$-set actions, where at each round the learner selects $m$ out of $d$ items and observes only the aggregate loss of the selected items. The resulting action set contains $K=\binom{d}{m}$ elements and can therefore be exponentially large. We propose a computationally efficient algorithm that exploits this structure without explicitly enumerating the action set. Against adaptive non-anticipating adversaries, it guarantees, with probability at least $1-δ$, regret against the best action in hindsight of $R_T =O(\sqrt{dT\log(K/δ)}). $ This matches the high-probability regret bound of the finite-action EXP3 with Kiefer-Wolfowitz exploration algorithm of Zimmert and Lattimore, whose direct implementation may require exponential space. Our algorithm instead represents each sampling distribution with $d$ parameters and runs in polynomial time without enumerating the action set. This resolves an open problem posed by Maiti et al. We complement this upper bound with a matching high-probability lower bound. For all sufficiently small $δ$ and all sufficiently large horizons, every randomized algorithm admits an adaptive non-anticipating adversary for which, with probability at least $δ$, $R_T=Ω( \sqrt{dT\log(K/δ)}). $ Thus, the rate is minimax optimal up to universal constants in this regime. In particular, setting $m=1$ shows that the $\log K$ factor in the high-probability regret bound for ordinary $K$-armed bandits against adaptive non-anticipating adversaries is unavoidable. This strengthens the lower bound of Gerchinovitz and Lattimore, closing the remaining $\sqrt{\log K}$ gap between high-probability upper and lower regret bounds.

cs.LG