Most speech large language models (SLMs) still process speech in an offline manner. They only start responding after they receive the complete speech segment. However, many real-world applications require streaming speech interaction, for which the audio continuously flows in and the machine is required to answer questions based on the so far received audio chunks. For example, a user may ask the system to continuously count how many times a person's name has been mentioned while they are speaking. We observe a lack of benchmarks and evaluation protocols for real-time speech interaction. Motivated by this, we propose LibriSpeech-Real-QA, a dataset and a benchmark for real-time speech interaction. We construct different types of real-time question-answer pairs from LibriSpeech to evaluate whether speech LLMs can identify target words in streaming audio. We evaluate several popular real-time commercial models and find that they still tend to respond only after the speech turn has finished. We demonstrate that we can enable a pretrained SLM to perform this task, where we explore several modeling designs and establish a solid baseline for future research.
Quantifying glomerular inflammation in kidney-transplant biopsies is traditionally performed on single whole-slide sections using the Banff "most-severe section" rule, despite the inherently three-dimensional nature of lesion distribution. This 2D based assessment might lead to instability when inflammation varies across slices. This paper reports a feasibility study examining the technical feasibility and clinical relevance of extending Banff scoring into three dimensions. To this end, we propose a 3D Banff lesion-scoring framework that aligns serial sections, reconstructs glomerular identities across depth, and integrates inflammatory-cell counts in 3D under three scoring strategies: Compatible, Volumetric, and Deduplicated Volumetric. In the experiments, glomerulitis (g-scores) was used as an example Banff metric and applied to multi-section renal allograft biopsies. Our findings indicate that 3D Banff g-scores are more consistent across sections and, under the semi-automatic setting, the Volumetric strategy correlates more strongly with clinical biomarkers than traditional 2D scores. These results show that 3D volumetric quantification offers promising added value, underscoring the potential benefit of 3D-aware Banff scoring for kidney transplant pathology.
Goal pursuit in open-ended dialogue requires agents to adapt their actions to interaction feedback across successive exchanges. We investigate whether agentic capabilities developed for multi-step tool use carry over to dialogue organized through the model's native tool interface, and how this changes interaction behavior. We define Tool-Mediated Interaction (TMI) as a training-free protocol that represents dialogue actions as tool calls and counterpart responses as tool results, maintaining a continuous reasoning-action-observation loop with retained reasoning and interaction history. We evaluate TMI across social interaction, emotional support, persuasion, and price negotiation using two models and 15,678 main-experiment episodes. Across both models, TMI improves social goal attainment, emotional-support preference, donation amounts, and buyer negotiation margins over conversational baselines with and without thinking. A Qwen ablation further shows that TMI outperforms ordinary conversation with retained reasoning on all four primary outcomes. Behavioral analyses associate the improvements with task-specific patterns in initial proposals and responses to interaction feedback. Alongside these gains, TMI reduces mean reasoning tokens per decision by 42.0-81.5% relative to the thinking baseline and lowers mean cross-turn phrase reuse across all eight model-environment pairs. These findings show that interaction organization shapes both goal attainment and reasoning across dialogue turns.
World action models (WAMs) increasingly couple internal visual or world representations with action generation, making their world-to-action pathways a critical yet poorly understood source of robustness. We investigate when perturbations to these internal representations actually become behaviorally consequential, and uncover a pronounced mismatch between representation perturbability and closed-loop vulnerability: attack effectiveness varies sharply across visual K/V routes, while larger representation displacement does not reliably imply stronger control failure. Our analysis attributes this mismatch to the action-conditioned readout, where keys determine where action queries read and values determine what content they receive. This motivates an action-facing view of vulnerability, in which the effect of a perturbation depends on how it is routed into action generation rather than on representation-space magnitude alone. We instantiate this view with Tail-AV, a short-probe signal for identifying vulnerable routes, and operationalize it in PASA-KV, which selects action-facing K/V targets before training a fresh task-shared attack. Experiments across multiple WAM systems and a physical robot validate readout-informed target selection, demonstrate strong closed-loop attacks, and reveal substantial system-level differences in resistance.
Spatial transcriptomics (ST) enables joint characterization of tissue morphology and gene expression. However, 3D volumetric ST acquisition remains expensive. AI-driven methods offer a low-cost alternative but remain limited in accuracy, while recent 2D section-wise ST acquisition still rely on dense grid sampling, resulting in redundant measurements and undersampling of biologically informative regions. To bridge the gap, we propose STRATA, a reinforcement-driven active sampling framework with tri-paradigm adaptation for reconstructing dense 3D transcriptomic maps from sparse voxel-wise ST acquisition. STRATA constructs a 3D graph integrating H&E morphology with single-cell priors and employs a reinforcement learning agent to estimate morphological sparsity and transcriptomic informativeness, enabling budget-aware selection of informative spots. Given these sparse measurements, an adaptive tri-paradigm predictor combines retrieval, regression, and cross-layer imputation through lightweight fusion, dynamically weighting their contributions. Experiments across datasets demonstrate improved sampling efficiency and accuracy, particularly under low-budget settings. Code is available at https://github.com/Junchao-Zhu/STRATA.
Equivariant structure-prediction pipelines alternate coordinate updates with the construction of a k-nearest-neighbour (kNN) graph whose membership is a discrete, piecewise-constant function of the coordinates. Rebuilding that graph at every block boundary (PB) is the expensive part of an epoch, whereas reusing one frozen graph (F) is fast but leaves a topology gap. We study a two-pass design in which the cheap pass records a small amount of state (margins, kNN radii, measured per-boundary displacements) and a second pass compensates conservatively. We formulate the choice of the graph-construction basis as a damped fixed-point iteration whose unique fixed point is exactly PB, and derive (i) exact non-flip certificates with the two-sided constant $m_i/4$ and one-sided constant $m_i/2$, (ii) the minimum-variance (BLUE) replay gain $γ^*$ and the resulting feasibility crossover, (iii) an $\ell_\infty$ trust-region projection that preserves convergence, and (iv) an analytic near-tie spacing law $E[m] \approx r_k/(3k)$ that matches measurements to 1\%. Three compensation levels are implemented in C++ (L1: frozen set with live geometry; L2: margin-gated local repair; L3: damped, projected basis) and validated under a matched-conditions protocol (identical seed, MSA depth and trajectory family, only the topology mode differs). L2 reproduces the PB edge set exactly ($D = 0.0000$ at every boundary), L1 stays within 0.6% and L3 interpolates monotonically: L2 reproduces the PB edge set exactly when the trust region is removed, and L3 interpolates between the frozen and the PB topology. The recorded trajectory itself yields a measured $1.5\times$ Pass-1 and $1.76\times$ epoch speed-up with no measurable loss gap. An open-source implementation of the runtime and of all the experiments reported here is available at https://github.com/AlbertHuang96/ProteinPredictMachineLearning.
Qingrui Li, Haowei Lou, Chengkai Huang, Quan Z. Sheng, Lina Yao
Pretrained audio encoders are increasingly used to provide content representations for music recommendation, but their downstream value can change substantially with the recommendation interface through which they are used. We study this effect across six pretrained audio encoders and three representative settings: content-based retrieval, sequential recommendation, and Semantic-ID-based generative recommendation. Using matched random-feature and ID-only controls, we distinguish absolute recommendation performance from gains over content-free inputs. Across two music datasets and a full-catalog evaluation, music-pretrained and audio-text-aligned encoders are generally stronger when their pretrained geometry is used directly or converted into Semantic IDs, while these differences become much smaller after interaction-based adaptation in SASRec. We further examine how audio representations should be discretized for generative recommendation by varying residual-quantization width, depth, and retained layers. At epoch 10, depth one performs best at every tested width, while larger codebooks generally help at depth three; the best single-layer subset also outperforms the full three-layer identifier in every evaluated comparison. For CLAP-Music, the third-layer identifier ranks higher under both original and shuffled assignments, whereas the full three-layer identifier gains more from the original assignment. Better reconstruction likewise does not ensure better ranking. Overall, our results show that the utility of pretrained audio representations is interface-dependent and that Semantic-ID quality should be assessed by downstream ranking rather than representation fidelity alone.
Agent Skills allow LLM agents to combine reusable capabilities, but checking each Skill in isolation cannot rule out policy violations when they are composed. We term such failures Conflict of Skills (CoS): artifacts or assessment signals produced for one purpose may be reused downstream without preserving the restrictions or authorization needed for their new use. Using controlled executions of publicly available Skills and matched single-Skill controls, we identify four recurring mechanisms behind CoS. Building on these findings, we introduce the Conflict of Skills Attack (CoSA), which adds locally admitted Skills to an existing pool to supply missing business operations (capability supplementation) or reshape artifact exchange, decision reuse, and target/action bindings (relationship reshaping). CoSA leaves existing Skills and runtime permissions unchanged. To evaluate this threat under autonomous Skill selection, we introduce CoSA-Bench, built from real-world Skills and controlled services, with 288 tasks across recruiting, finance, IT, and business, covering data leakage, unauthorized state modification, and unsafe execution. Across five LLMs and three agent harnesses, additions capped at 5% of each original pool raise the policy-violation rate from 35.02% to 58.45%, an increase of 23.43 percentage points. Trace analysis links compliant-to-violating transitions to cross-Skill dependencies involving the additions. Finally, we develop a lightweight harness-level guard that checks information flow and authorization before consequential actions. On OpenClaw recruiting tasks across five models, the guard reduces violations from 65.28% to 6.67%, while policy-compliant task completion on matched benign controls changes from 66.67% to 65.00%.
Zhixi Cai, Fucai Ke, Sukai Huang, Maria Garcia de la Banda, Peter J. Stuckey, Gholamreza Haffari, Hamid Rezatofighi
In complex embodied visual reasoning scenarios, an agent often has only a limited field of view, and the evidence needed to answer a question may be distributed across time, viewpoint, and interacting objects. A model may therefore give a plausible answer without ever observing the relevant object, time, or view that supports it. Current visual reasoning benchmarks largely evaluate passive observations and final answers, overlooking settings that require active reasoning and evidence acquisition. We introduce JRDB-AVR, a benchmark derived from existing real-world JRDB robotics data through a structured question-generation engine that turns this gap into an explicit evaluation: an embodied agentic system receives a visual reasoning question, requests bounded observations by timestamp and viewing angle, and is evaluated on both the final answer and the grounded visual evidence supporting it. The benchmark contains diverse questions over multiple real-world environments involving temporal search, viewpoint selection, and human-oriented compositional reasoning. We also introduce JRDB-AVR-Agent, a reference active reasoning agentic method that maintains an explicit observation-grounded graph-based world model and answers through solving. Experiments reveal a substantial gap between answer accuracy and evidence accuracy in current baselines, showing that current VLMs can produce unsupported correct answers and that active evidence-aware evaluation is necessary for embodied visual reasoning. Code and benchmark are available at https://github.com/ControlNet/JRDB-AVR.
Zhengyang Ai Huawei Technologies Ltd., Zikang Shan Peking University, Xiaodong Ai Huawei Technologies Ltd., Jingxian Tang, Hangkai Hu Huawei Technologies Ltd., Pinyan Lu Huawei Technologies Ltd. and Shanghai University of Finance and Economics
Process supervision has emerged as a promising approach for enhancing LLM reasoning, yet existing methods fail to distinguish meaningful progress from mere verbosity, leading to limited reasoning capabilities and unresolved token inefficiency. To address this, we propose Stage-aware Hierarchical Advantage via Potential Estimation (SHAPE), a framework that formalizes reasoning as a trajectory through a state space of empirical solvability. SHAPE introduces a hierarchical credit assignment mechanism: at the segment level, it employs a stage-aware advantage function to prioritize efficient breakthroughs in low-potential states; at the token level, it utilizes entropy-driven redistribution to sharpen execution signals. Extensive experiments in math reasoning across three base models and five benchmarks demonstrate that SHAPE achieves an average accuracy gain of 3% with 30% reduced token consumption.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Chunhua Liu University of Melbourne, Kabir Manandhar Shrestha University of Melbourne, Sukai Huang Monash University
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit cultural bias from over-represented viewpoints in training data, yet cultural alignment remains a challenge due to limited cultural knowledge and a lack of exploration into effective learning approaches. We introduce a cost-efficient and cognitively grounded method: fine-tuning LLMs on native speakers’ word-association norms, leveraging cognitive psychology findings that such associations capture cultural knowledge. Using word association datasets from native speakers in the US (English) and China (Mandarin), we train Llama-3.1-8B and Qwen-2.5-7B via supervised fine-tuning and preference optimization. We evaluate models’ cultural alignment through a two-tier evaluation framework that spans low-level lexical associations and high-level cultural value alignment using the World Values Survey. Results show significant improvements in lexical alignment (16–20% English, 43–165% Mandarin on Precision@5) and high-level cultural value shifts. On a subset of 50 questions where US and Chinese respondents diverge most, fine-tuned Qwen nearly doubles its response alignment with Chinese values (13 to 25). Remarkably, our trained 7–8B models match or exceed vanilla 70B baselines, demonstrating that a few million of culture-grounded associations achieve value alignment without expensive retraining. Our work highlights both the promise and the need for future research grounded in human cognition in improving cultural alignment in AI models.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Kai Hu, Abhinav Aggarwal Facebook, Mehran Khodabandeh Meta, David Zhang, Eric Hsin Facebook, Li Chen Meta, Ankit Jain Meta, Matt Fredrikson Gray Swan AI and Carnegie Mellon University 等 9 位作者
This paper presents a novel Automated Red Teaming (ART) framework that shifts from example-based to policy-based evaluation, addressing critical limitations in scalability and validity. We define harmful content through abstract safety policies rather than specific static examples. We also introduce multiple evaluation objectives: risk coverage, semantic diversity, and fidelity, and discover Pareto trade-offs between them. We propose Jailbreak-Zero, a black-box method capable of both zero-shot generation and fine-tuned exploitation of a victim’s vulnerabilities to achieve Pareto optimality. Unlike prior approaches, it does not require expert-designed strategies/prompts, but still achieves superior, human-readable attacks against open-source and proprietary models (attack success rates of 99.5% against GPT-4o and 96.0% against Claude 3.5), even for unseen safety policies. It retains efficacy even after victim models undergo safety alignment, and exposes controls to navigate Pareto trade-offs without retraining. Lastly, we show that Jailbreak-Zero is the best-performing ART method at a given compute budget. Code is available at: https://github.com/hukkai/jailbreak-zero/ .
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Yilin Zhang, Yingkai Hua, Chunyu Wei Renmin University of China, Xin Wang, Yueguo Chen Renmin University of China
Vision-language model (VLM) based web agents demonstrate impressive autonomous GUI interaction but remain vulnerable to deceptive interface elements. Existing approaches either detect deception without task integration or document attacks without proposing defenses. We formalize deception-aware web agent defense and propose DUDE (Deceptive UI Detector Evaluator), a two-stage framework combining hybrid-reward learning with asymmetric penalties and experience summarization to distill failure patterns into transferable guidance. We introduce RUC (Real UI Clickboxes), a benchmark of 1,407 scenarios spanning four domains and deception categories. Experiments show DUDE reduces deception susceptibility by 53.8% while maintaining task performance, establishing an effective foundation for robust web agent deployment.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL · cs.CV
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Chuhan Wang University of Notre Dame, Xintong Li, Jennifer Yuntong Zhang, Junda Wu University of California, San Diego, Chengkai Huang, Lina Yao University of New South Wales, Julian McAuley University of California, San Diego, University of California, San Diego, Jingbo Shang University of California, San Diego
Multimodal large language models often struggle with faithful reasoning in complex visual scenes, where intricate entities and relations require precise visual grounding at each step. This reasoning unfaithfulness frequently manifests as hallucinated entities, mis-grounded relations, skipped steps, and over-specified reasoning. Existing preference-based approaches, typically relying on textual perturbations or answer-conditioned rationales, fail to address this challenge as they allow models to exploit language priors to bypass visual grounding. To address this, we propose SceneAlign, a framework that leverages scene graphs as structured visual information to perform controllable structural interventions. By identifying reasoning-critical nodes and perturbing them through four targeted strategies that mimic typical grounding failures, SceneAlign constructs hard negative rationales that remain linguistically plausible but are grounded in inaccurate visual facts. These contrastive pairs are used in Direct Preference Optimization to steer models toward fine-grained, structure-faithful reasoning. Across seven visual reasoning benchmarks, SceneAlign consistently improves answer accuracy and reasoning faithfulness, highlighting the effectiveness of grounding-aware alignment for multimodal reasoning.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL · cs.CV
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Ziyou Jiang Institute of Software Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mingyang Li Institute of Software Chinese Academy of Sciences, Junjie Wang Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yuekai Huang, Jie Huang, Zhiyuan Chang, Zhaoyang Li, Qing Wang
Harmful memes are ever-shifting in the Internet communities, which are difficult to analyze due to their type-shifting and temporal-evolving nature. Although these memes are shifting, we find that different memes may share invariant principles, i.e., the underlying design concept of malicious users, which can help us analyze why these memes are harmful. In this paper, we propose RepMD, an ever-shifting harmful meme detection method based on the design concept reproduction. We first refer to the attack tree to define the Design Concept Graph (DCG), which describes steps that people may take to design a harmful meme. Then, we derive the DCG from historical memes with design step reproduction and graph pruning. Finally, we use DCG to guide the Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) to detect harmful memes. The evaluation results show that RepMD achieves the highest accuracy with 81.1% and has slight accuracy decreases when generalized to type-shifting and temporal-evolving memes. Human evaluation shows that RepMD can improve the efficiency of human discovery on harmful memes, with 15\sim30 seconds per meme.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL · cs.CV
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Zhizhang Fu, Yuancheng Gu, Chenkai Hu New York University, Hanmeng Liu Hainan University, Yue Zhang Westlake University
Test-time scaling has enabled Large Language Models (LLMs) to tackle complex reasoning, yet the limitations of current Chain-of-Thought (CoT) evaluation obscure whether performance gains stem from genuine reasoning or mere verbosity. To address this, (1) we propose a novel neuro-symbolic framework for the non-intrusive, comprehensive process-centric evaluation of reasoning grounded in First-Order Logic. (2) Through this lens, we identify four distinct behavioral prototypes and diagnose the failure modes. (3) We examine the impact of inference mode, training strategy, and model scale. Our analysis reveals that extended token generation is not a prerequisite for deep reasoning. Furthermore, we reveal critical constraints: mixing long and short CoT data in training risks premature saturation and collapse, while distillation into smaller models captures behavioral length but fails to replicate logical efficacy due to intrinsic capacity limits.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表