跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1151新增论文
+896其中 AI 相关
+86已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-07 02:52 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-06 13:12各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-06 03:45 — 2026-11-07 03:45(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-07 02:52最近发现新增版本:2026-11-06 13:12库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,055 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-07 02:50(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2609.34639

Uniform Race: Parameter-Free Approximate Rejection Sampling

Seiyun Shin, Juhyeong Pang, Kwang-Sung Jun

Consider the approximate sampling problem: given $N$ independent samples from a proposal distribution $μ$, the goal is to select one whose distribution is close to a target $π$ specified only up to a normalizing constant. The seminal work of Block & Polyanskiy (2023) provides a total variation (TV) error bound for approximate rejection sampling (RS) as a function of the algorithm's acceptance threshold $M$. The ideal threshold $M$ that minimizes the bound, however, depends on properties of $(π, μ)$ that are typically unavailable from the observed sample. This raises a natural question: Can one attain the best RS guarantee without taking the best $M$ as input? We answer this question affirmatively by proposing a parameter-free sampling algorithm called uniform race (UR). UR computes a score for each sample $y$ that is the importance weight $π(y)/μ(y)$ divided by an independent uniform random variable and then returns the one with the highest score. We prove that UR attains the best $M$-tuned TV error bound for RS. That is, UR, without knowing the best $M$, achieves the same performance guarantee as RS that takes the best $M$ as input. We also prove that UR has no larger TV error than the budget-calibrated version of the rejection sampler of Rohatgi et al. (2025) and sampling importance resampling (SIR). In particular, we identify instances where UR's error is exponentially smaller in $N$ than that of these two baselines. Furthermore, we establish conditions under which attaining this RS guarantee for every $(π, μ)$ uniquely determines the selection probabilities as those of UR. Finally, test-time scaling experiments on LLM reasoning tasks corroborate the theoretical comparisons and demonstrate that UR remains competitive without requiring threshold selection.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.LG · stat.ML
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
版本更新 · v3arXiv:2502.14379

Achieving adaptivity and optimality for multi-armed bandits using Exponential-Kullback Leibler Maillard Sampling

Hao Qin, Kwang-Sung Jun, Chicheng Zhang

We study the problem of $K$-armed bandits with reward distributions belonging to a one-parameter exponential distribution family. In the literature, several criteria have been proposed to evaluate the performance of such algorithms, including Asymptotic Optimality, Minimax Optimality, Sub-UCB, and variance-adaptive regret bound. Thompson Sampling-based and Upper Confidence Bound-based algorithms have been employed to achieve some of these criteria. However, none of these algorithms simultaneously satisfy all the aforementioned criteria. In this paper, we design an algorithm, Exponential Kullback-LeiblerMaillard Sampling (abbrev. Exp-KL-MS), that achieves multiple optimality criteria simultaneously, including Asymptotic Optimality, minimax ratio with a $\sqrt{\ln (K)}$ factor, Sub-UCB, and a variance-adaptive regret bound. Our algorithm design follows the Minimum Empirical Divergence framework~\citep{honda2011asymptotically,maillard2011apprentissage}, with the exploration probability of arm $a$ proportional to $\text{exp}\left(-L(N_{t-1, a}) \text{KL}(\hatμ_{t-1, a}, \max_{a'} \hatμ_{t-1, a'})\right)$, where $L(\cdot)$ is an inverse temperature function, $N_{t-1, a}$ is the number of times arm $a$ has been pulled before time $t$, $\hatμ_{t-1, a}$ is the empirical mean of arm $a$ before time $t$, and $\text{KL}(\cdot, \cdot)$ is the Kullback-Leibler divergence between two distributions in the one-parameter exponential distribution family. Our analysis allows different choices of inverse temperature function $L(k)$. We also provide numerical simulations demonstrating the effectiveness of our algorithms.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.LG · cs.DS
arXiv ↗PDF ↗