跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+586新增论文
+453其中 AI 相关
+91已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-13 11:13 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-13 11:12各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-12 12:48 — 2026-11-13 12:48(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-13 11:13最近发现新增版本:2026-11-13 11:12库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 22:55

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

22,261 已收录论文18,776 AI 相关6,286 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-13 11:11(北京时间)
版本更新 · v6arXiv:2510.05107

Structured Cognitive Loop for Behavioral Intelligence in Large Language Model Agents (Extended Revision: From Behavioral Architecture to Epistemic Accountability)

Myung Ho Kim

原文摘要

The central challenge for AI agents is not performance but accountability. An agent that produces correct outputs through an opaque process offers no basis for verifying why a decision was permitted, attributing errors to identifiable causes, or delegating authority with justified confidence. We introduce the Structured Cognitive Loop (SCL), an architecture that separates cognition, control, action, and memory: the language model proposes, a lightweight controller mediates every proposal before action, and memory is kept externally as a structured store of verified facts. Against ReAct and common LangChain agents on three tasks under matched models, tools, and decoding, SCL achieves 86.3% task success versus 70.5-76.8% across 360 episodes, with higher goal fidelity, fewer redundant calls, more reliable reuse of intermediate states, and fewer unsupported assertions; ablations show that control and external memory contribute independently. We then situate SCL within a broader accountability architecture comprising context-aware human-in-the-loop control, Pool-Gated Retrieval, and the Horizon-Warrant-Commitment framework, and outline the current direction of development, in which instructions are compiled into programs validated before execution so that execution authority derives from a verified program rather than per-cycle model interpretation. For the kind of accountability it pursues, SCL adopts neither multi-agent consensus as a proxy for truth nor the imitation of human cognition as a design goal: it institutionalizes cognition rather than imitating it.

cs.AI