跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+1已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-08 05:06 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-07 17:43各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-07 05:57 — 2026-11-08 05:57(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-08 05:06最近发现新增版本:2026-11-07 17:43库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,056 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-08 05:04(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.05437

Req-Space: A User Study of Interactive Visualisations for Requirements Review

Risha Parveen, Navneet Arora, Zheying Zhang, Kalle Mäkelä, Pekka Abrahamsson

原文摘要

Requirements review involves identifying inconsistencies and assessing change implications across distributed specifications. Motivated by needs raised in industrial project workshops, we investigate Req-Space, an interactive prototype integrating semantic exploration and traceability visualisation to support human-led review. We conducted a fixed-order, two-phase study with 20 participants, including 11 with at least three years of software or IT experience. Participants reviewed a fictional 40-requirement software specification and a guest-checkout change request, first using source documents and then revisiting the same tasks with Req-Space. During the supported review, 17 participants recorded at least one additional source-supported item or pair. Of 69 assessable additional units, 58 (84.1%) were judged supported by the source materials. Seven decision rationales were judged stronger in Phase 2, including five without a change in the decision category. Participants generally found the visualisations helpful, although workload responses were mixed and some misinterpreted visual relationships. The findings suggest that visual support can facilitate requirements exploration and decision justification, provided relationship meanings and source context remain clear. The fixed study sequence prevents attributing the observed changes specifically to Req-Space.

cs.SE