跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

采集已暂停
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+0新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:等待完成 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-02 00:39各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-03 20:28 — 2026-11-04 20:28(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:尚未完成最近发现新增版本:2026-11-02 00:39库内论文最新更新时间:2026-10-30 01:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

8,677 已收录论文7,675 AI 相关1,866 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序等待首次采集
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2607.18220

Approximate Envy-Freeness and Pareto Optimality Beyond Additivity

Harish Chandramouleeswaran, Prajakta Nimbhorkar

We study the compatibility of envy-freeness up to one good (EF1) and Pareto optimality (PO) beyond additive valuations. For two agents with monotone submodular valuations, we prove that a $2/3$-EF1+PO allocation always exists, while for every $α>3/4$, an $α$-EF1+PO allocation may fail to exist even for unweighted coverage valuations. A six-good EF1+PO counterexample resolves the longstanding exact existence question negatively. Exact EF1+PO does exist when one agent has a monotone submodular valuation and the remaining agents have identical additive valuations. For two agents, we also establish tight EF$k$+PO item thresholds of $4k+1$, $2k+1$, and $3k+1$ for two submodular agents, two subadditive agents, and one subadditive and one additive agent, respectively. Finally, deciding whether an EF$k$+PO allocation exists is NP-hard for every fixed integer $k\ge1$, even for three agents with unweighted coverage valuations, one of whom has an additive valuation.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.GT · cs.DS
arXiv ↗PDF ↗