Thomson Yen, Gilbert Yang, Naimeng Ye, Minghui Chen, Dong Xia, Tianyi Shen, Yechan Jeon, Yaqin Chen 等 11 位作者
Language-model agents differ fundamentally from prior intelligent systems in their ability to learn from natural language in context. This capability enables agents to iteratively refine their answers in response to feedback, a prevalent mode of operation in modern agentic workflows. However, the community primarily ranks models by metrics such as Pass@1 or Pass@K, which cannot capture how they utilize feedback on prior attempts. We introduce Seq@K, a natural evaluation protocol that measures whether a model can solve a problem within K sequential attempts, provided feedback after each previous failure. Unlike multi-turn agentic benchmarks that examine long-horizon planning, Seq@K isolates and formalizes the core capability of refinement from feedback. We evaluate Seq@K on a suite of 7 benchmarks and 16 frontier models, and show that Seq@K reveals a materially different model-selection landscape: under Seq@K, (1) model rankings often differ, (2) the Pareto frontiers admit more efficient configurations and (3) the gains from choosing the optimal model configuration can widen or shrink relative to those of Pass@K. We further show that analyzing model trajectories under Seq@K helps characterize iterative refinement behavior, such as the rate at which models address issues raised in feedback, or how rigidly they hold onto their own answers. Finally, we study how the nature of feedback affects models' iterative refinement, showing that practitioners must carefully design and benchmark the feedback loops of iterative agentic systems. Together, these results establish how Seq@K offers a more faithful metric for intelligent systems that typically operate in such feedback loop, and the necessity to consider Seq@K in evaluating models for these systems.
Yipeng Hao, Yuxuan Cai, Wenkai Ji, Jie Zhou, Liyang Yu, Qin Chen, Zhiguo Yan, Shulei Zheng 等 9 位作者
Memory helps LLM-based multi-agent systems reuse experience, but stored advice can be flawed or applied in the wrong situation. Team-level success or failure alone cannot reliably show whether a memory needs correction or should not have been used. We propose DiscernMem, a training-free framework that improves both memory quality and memory use. To improve quality, Defect-Aware Memory Refinement (DMR) compares team executions with a single memory and with no memory, diagnoses rule defects, and tests repairs on current and earlier tasks to guard against losing previously useful behavior. To guide appropriate use, Boundary-Learning Meta-Memory (BLM) records each memory's past uses and effects, learning when its owner role should apply or avoid it based on task context and incoming messages. Together, these components help teams correct flawed experience while retaining useful rules that were applied incorrectly. Experiments with Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 on four benchmarks show that DiscernMem achieves the highest average score on AutoGen, CAMEL, and MacNet, exceeding the strongest reported baselines by 0.51-4.32 points. It leads on code generation and symbolic planning across all three systems, including a PDDL score of 37.71 versus 28.48 on CAMEL.
Kedi Chen, Dezhao Ruan East China Normal University, Yuhao Dan, Yaoting Wang Fudan University, Siyu Yan, Xuecheng Wu, Yinqi Zhang Xiaohongshu, Qin Chen East China Normal University 等 15 位作者
Reasoning is an important task for large language models (LLMs). Among all the reasoning paradigms, inductive reasoning is one of the basic types, which is characterized by its particular-to-general thinking process and the non-uniqueness of its answers. The inductive mode is crucial for knowledge generalization and aligns better with human cognition, so it is a fundamental mode of learning, hence attracting increasing interest. Despite the importance of inductive reasoning, there is no systematic summary of it. Therefore, this paper presents the first comprehensive survey of inductive reasoning for LLMs. First, methods for improving inductive reasoning are categorized into three main areas: post-training enhancement, test-time exploration, and data augmentation. Then, current benchmarks of inductive reasoning are summarized, and a unified sandbox-based evaluation approach with the observation coverage metric is derived. Finally, we offer some analyses regarding the source of inductive ability and how simple model architectures and data help with inductive tasks, providing a solid foundation for future research.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Shiqiang Tian, Cheng Ding, Qin Chen East China Normal University, Jie Zhou, Liang He East China Normal University
Knowledge editing is a promising method for updating Large Language Models efficiently. However, previous studies often suffer from poor specificity in continual editing, as they typically focus on single edits or preventing knowledge forgetting. To address this, we propose TamEdit, a trajectory-aware meta-learning method that preserves specificity for continual knowledge editing. TamEdit unifies three levels: Inner Optimization performs multi-step fast fine-tuning on the single edit; Trajectory-based Editing unifies continual edits with a growing memory; and Outer Optimization leverages meta-learning to distill cross-task strategies for preserving specificity. By capturing the relationships between different single edits within the trajectory, our method learns how to effectively avoid specificity drift. Experiments across multiple LLMs show TamEdit significantly outperforms baselines in continual editing, improving specificity by 14.81% with fast speed (requiring only 8.84% of the time cost of most baselines), while preserving general capabilities.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表