跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1151新增论文
+896其中 AI 相关
+86已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-06 13:13 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-06 13:12各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-05 13:40 — 2026-11-06 13:40(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-06 13:13最近发现新增版本:2026-11-06 13:12库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,055 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 4 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-06 13:11(北京时间)
版本更新 · v3arXiv:2604.15001

COEVO: Co-Evolutionary Framework for Joint Functional Correctness and PPA Optimization in LLM-Based RTL Code Generation

Heng Ping, Peiyu Zhang, Shixuan Li, Wei Yang, Anzhe Cheng, Shukai Duan, Xiaole Zhang, Paul Bogdan

LLM-based RTL code generation methods increasingly target both functional correctness and PPA quality, yet existing approaches decouple the two objectives, optimizing PPA only after full correctness is achieved. Sequential multi-agent pipelines, evolutionary search with binary correctness gates, and hierarchical reward dependencies all discard partially correct but architecturally promising candidates. Moreover, existing methods reduce the multi-objective PPA space to a single scalar fitness that obscures the trade-offs among area, delay, and power. To address these limitations, we propose COEVO, a co-evolutionary framework that unifies correctness and PPA optimization within a single evolutionary loop. COEVO formulates correctness as a continuous co-optimization dimension alongside area, delay, and power, enabled by an enhanced testbench with fine-grained scoring. The framework allows PPA-promising but partially correct candidates to guide the search toward jointly optimal solutions, and further employs four-dimensional Pareto-based non-dominated sorting to preserve the PPA trade-off structure without manual weight tuning. On VerilogEval 2.0 and RTLLM 2.0, COEVO surpasses all agentic baselines across four LLM backbones. With GPT-5.4-mini, COEVO achieves 97.5\% and 94.5\% Pass@1 and attains the best PPA on 43 out of 49 synthesizable RTLLM 2.0 designs.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.AI
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.03602

Reviso: Not All Visual Evidence Deserves Equal Attention in Video Captioning

Tengfei Liu, Yang Shi, Yuran Wang, Yuqi Tang, Yizhuo Jia, Zhuoran Zhang, Qixun Wang, Shujie Li 等 15 位作者

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can generate detailed video captions, yet they may overemphasize minor details while overlooking essential context and key events. We argue that not all visual evidence deserves equal attention, as the importance of visual information depends on the content of each video. Motivated by this observation, we propose Reviso, an agentic video captioning framework that learns what to observe and how to gather relevant visual evidence. From a low-frame-rate global preview, Reviso constructs a hierarchical Context--Focus--Points (CFP) observation plan that identifies the video context, prioritizes key aspects, and defines concrete observation targets and corresponding tools. Guided by this plan, Reviso performs goal-directed active perception by selectively revisiting temporal segments and combining tools for fine-grained inspection. It interprets the acquired evidence, updates its plan as needed, and integrates global and local information to generate the final caption. To learn this observation strategy, we develop a verification-guided pipeline that constructs high-quality training trajectories through factual verification and teacher-guided refinement. We further train Reviso using Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), incorporating a key-fact reward for caption quality, a Plan Alignment Reward (PAR) for identifying important observation targets, and an Unproductive Tool-Call Penalty (UTCP) that adjusts observation-cost penalties based on caption quality. Experiments across four video captioning benchmarks show that Reviso outperforms the evaluated open-source baselines, while its generated captions better support downstream video question answering. These findings highlight the effectiveness and potential of priority-guided active observation for video captioning.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CV
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.1924ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

Outcome Accuracy is Not Enough: Aligning the Reasoning Process of Reward Models

Binghai Wang, Yantao Liu Qwen Team, Alibaba Group, Yuxuan Liu Qwen Team, Alibaba Group, Tianyi Tang Alibaba Group, Shenzhi Wang Alibaba Group, Chang Gao Alibaba Group, Chujie Zheng Alibaba Group, Yichang Zhang Alibaba Group 等 16 位作者

Generative Reward Models (GenRMs) and LLM-as-a-Judge exhibit deceptive alignment by producing correct judgments for incorrect reasons, as they are trained and evaluated to prioritize Outcome Accuracy, which undermines their ability to generalize during RLHF. We introduce Rationale Consistency, a fine-grained metric that quantifies the alignment between the model’s reasoning process and human judgment. Our evaluation of frontier models reveals that rationale consistency effectively discriminates among state-of-the-art models and detects deceptive alignment, while outcome accuracy falls short in both respects. To mitigate this gap, we introduce a hybrid signal that combines rationale consistency with outcome accuracy for GenRM training. Our training method achieves state-of-the-art performance on RM-Bench (87.1%) and JudgeBench (82%), surpassing outcome-only baselines by an average of 5%. Using RM during RLHF, our method effectively improves performance as demonstrated on Arena Hard v2, notably yielding a 7% improvement in creative writing tasks. Further analysis confirms that our method escapes the deceptive alignment trap, effectively reversing the decline in rationale consistency observed in outcome-only training.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表

ACL Anthology · ACL 2026 ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2505.09388Google Research

Qwen3 Technical Report

An Yang, Anfeng Li, Baosong Yang, Beichen Zhang, Binyuan Hui, Bo Zheng, Bowen Yu, Chang Gao 等 60 位作者

In this work, we present Qwen3, the latest version of the Qwen model family. Qwen3 comprises a series of large language models (LLMs) designed to advance performance, efficiency, and multilingual capabilities. The Qwen3 series includes models of both dense and Mixture-of-Expert (MoE) architectures, with parameter scales ranging from 0.6 to 235 billion. A key innovation in Qwen3 is the integration of thinking mode (for complex, multi-step reasoning) and non-thinking mode (for rapid, context-driven responses) into a unified framework. This eliminates the need to switch between different models--such as chat-optimized models (e.g., GPT-4o) and dedicated reasoning models (e.g., QwQ-32B)--and enables dynamic mode switching based on user queries or chat templates. Meanwhile, Qwen3 introduces a thinking budget mechanism, allowing users to allocate computational resources adaptively during inference, thereby balancing latency and performance based on task complexity. Moreover, by leveraging the knowledge from the flagship models, we significantly reduce the computational resources required to build smaller-scale models, while ensuring their highly competitive performance. Empirical evaluations demonstrate that Qwen3 achieves state-of-the-art results across diverse benchmarks, including tasks in code generation, mathematical reasoning, agent tasks, etc., competitive against larger MoE models and proprietary models. Compared to its predecessor Qwen2.5, Qwen3 expands multilingual support from 29 to 119 languages and dialects, enhancing global accessibility through improved cross-lingual understanding and generation capabilities. To facilitate reproducibility and community-driven research and development, all Qwen3 models are publicly accessible under Apache 2.0.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CL
arXiv ↗PDF ↗